Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Infinity Wars spoilers discussion


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I'm not huge into Marvel so just spoiled myself.  Sounds like Captain Marvel is coming in.  

Also seems like they made it a little obvious that the deaths will somehow be reverse with an OG sacrificing themselves to turn back time or some crazy banana panda madness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the post credit scene was for captain marvel..(apparently her solo movie is gonna be set in the 90s way before infinity war)

Overall I thought it was an good film. Not bad, Not amazing but good.

It really felt like just set up for the next avengers film. Of course they're gonna find a way to reverse most of these deaths but i'm hoping at least some stick.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This film seemed like a huge back-story for Thanos.  I like how they fleshed out his character.  There was a ton of silent people when the screen went dark.  I even saw a few people throw up their hands.  I get that a lot of people forever want the super-mega-happy Scooby Doo ending, but I think this film delivered on almost everything it set out to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loved the red skull appearance. The end credits is for Captain Marvel. Doesn't her movie come out before Avengers 4? 

 

I think it's safe to say that if you died in the "traditional sense" (Loki, Gamora) then you're staying dead. There's no way Marvel is going to leave Black Panther and Spidey dead because theyre supposed to carry the MCU for the next generation. 

Loved how they handled Dr Strange. Came across as the heavy hitter that he is. 

I LOVED the movie. Felt like an event comic jumped off the page. However, it was essentially a set up for the other Avengers movie. It was originally a 2 parter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An absolutely incredible film. I'm still in shock they pulled off all those characters while making it compelling, entertaining and hilarious. 

Oh and they established the hardest villain to date in the MCU with arguably the best results. I say hardest because you had to really feel the weight of Thanos. From opening scene to finale, they did it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

So Dr Strange is the real hero in all of this. He is the one that looked through millions of possible outcomes and found the one where they win. So he went with it. Basically he knows all at this point. Well, he did until he turned to ash. lol

 

I think Strange saw it all,  everyone dying, including himself. That’s why he was so shocked when he said he only saw one way that they can win. He had to trust in himself that he was correct, which from his solo movie we know he isn’t lacking in confidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s an interesting theory about how Thanos says ‘I gave up on my destiny once before’ before throwing Gamora over the cliff. It could be that Captain Marvel was the one that stopped him before and Nick Fury recognised what was happening and reached out for her straight away. The CM movie could be about how she stopped him the first time. 

FYI - ****** DC, this is how you introduce a world ending villain and do the death of superman justice. Not at the end of some shitty cross-over. Ruined one of the best written comics ever With BvS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure most people will be brought back, with exception of Loki and Vision possibly.    I'm not sure MCU feels like getting rid of Loki though.   Vision wasn't done well from the beginning so he may be gone (but could be brought back, or in the future if Ultron reappears).      I think Gamora will be brought back since she was sacrificed to the soul stone in a way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...