Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS Sports 7 Round Mock Draft with trades


Recommended Posts

Hypothetically, How many spots would next year’s 3rd move us up in the 2nd this year. 

  Those are the players I want but like others am leery of losing a top 100 pick to do it. I think there will be very good WR/RB/TE options there at 85 and 88. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

I don’t think Penny last that long, and I rather keep the picks

This ^  Also we have too many needs to be giving away top-100 picks, especially to move up in the second for a safety.  

Bates or White + Sweat or Hamilton or Thomas over just Reid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

This ^  Also we have too many needs to be giving away top-100 picks, especially to move up in the second for a safety.  

Bates or White + Sweat or Hamilton or Thomas over just Reid.

On top of the fact that, after this draft, there will still be a sh1t-ton of competent safeties available in free agency that are desperate for a contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

On top of the fact that, after this draft, there will still be a sh1t-ton of competent safeties available in free agency that are desperate for a contract.

  And not one of them can provide even decent ability in coverage from the FS position. Something this team has lacked for a long time. Signing one of them for SS and getting rid of Adams and/or Searcy would be great. But we need an upgrade in range and athleticism at FS in the worst way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

And a 2nd round rookie is a stone-cold guarantee?  One you've flushed a top-100 pick for?

No one is a guarantee. But the S’s left on the market have proven over time that they can’t. I’d rather take a chance on an athletic, young, cheap player with great instincts. 

 As for “flushing” a top 100 pick, I said I wouldn’t trade a pick to move up for Reid. So no idea where that’s going?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be ok with next year’s 3rd or even usin our 5th and a 7th to get a 4th round.  But I don’t want to give up our 4 top 100 this year. 

Using our second and next year’s 3rd to get: Reid, Bates, Miller, Hurst, Gesecki might be tolerable. But still not ideal. 

I could see us doing that if we go WR in round one. Then there is a possibility that CB Oliver is there in the early second. I might be ok with that.  But not to double up on 2 secondary spots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toomers said:

  And not one of them can provide even decent ability in coverage from the FS position. Something this team has lacked for a long time. Signing one of them for SS and getting rid of Adams and/or Searcy would be great. But we need an upgrade in range and athleticism at FS in the worst way. 

I have read that Eric Reid has good coverage skills and can absolutely play as a FS on short to intermediate routes, but is a little more limited on deeper routes.

We could do worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I have read that Eric Reid has good coverage skills and can absolutely play as a FS on short to intermediate routes, but is a little more limited on deeper routes.

We could do worse.

  Almost any S can cover on short to intermediate routes. And considering we have Luke, TD and/or Shaq, and a limited SS, we don’t need a FS who can’t cover in space. We have plenty of guys who can only cover those routes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  Almost any S can cover on short to intermediate routes. And considering we have Luke, TD and/or Shaq, and a limited SS, we don’t need a FS who can’t cover in space. We have plenty of guys who can only cover those routes. 

The real  question would be whether there is enough in his game to indicate that he is at least serviceable (and maybe even improve) relative to allow us to picking up other positions in the draft (provided that we would look towards signing him or another vet after the draft of course).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...