Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eazy-E's Mock Draft


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

#24 | CB - Jaire Alexander, Louisville 

Although he doesn't fit the mold of a typical Panthers cornerback, he the ball skills and ability to play man that this secondary desperately needs. Julio Jones, Mike Evans, and Michael Thomas aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

 

#55 | TE - Hayden Hurst, South Carolina

I don't buy the first round hype due to his age and where tight ends have been selected in prior drafts. (Hunter Henry for example was a better prospect coming out and fell to the second round) If not Hurst then another tight end or Justin Reid if he falls to the pick.

 

#85 | RB - Rashaad Penny, San Diego State

In-between the tackles runner with the ability to catch the ball out of the backfield. Great compliment to McCaffrey.

 

#88 | G/C - Frank Ragnow, Arkansas

Competition for Moton and insurance for Ryan Kalil. Future starting center.

 

#161 | DB - Siran Neal, Jacksonville State

Small school prospect with a ton of potential. Could end up as a starting free safety.

 

#197 | WR - Tre'Quan Smith, Central Florida

Put up great numbers for an undefeated knights team. 78% of his receptions went for a first down. Will potentially have to trade up to select him.

 

#234 | LB - Oren Burks, Vanderbilt

High character guy who shined at the combine. Doesn't have a true position but could be a great fit for the Panthers buffalo package.

 

#242 | QB - J.T Barrett, Ohio State

Joe Webb replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the infatuation with Hurst. He hasn't played competitive football for that long and is 25 already. 

This year's TE class is very weak. 

We would be better off singing a veteran stopgap for a year then addressing the problem next year when hopefully the class is better and we can get a solid player at pick 32

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I don't understand the infatuation with Hurst. He hasn't played competitive football for that long and is 25 already. 

This year's TE class is very weak. 

We would be better off singing a veteran stopgap for a year then addressing the problem next year when hopefully the class is better and we can get a solid player at pick 32

For me it's more about knowing the Panthers have interest in him than personally liking him as a prospect. He could even be their RD1 pick I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

For me it's more about knowing the Panthers have interest in him than personally liking him as a prospect. He could even be their RD1 pick I think. 

this scares me considering how well connected you are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SOJA said:

this scares me considering how well connected you are

Me too.. Spending a 1st round pick on a backup TE (for at least 2 years) who is more of a Kris Magnum "solid guy" than a Olsen "elite guy".. smh..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

No safety until the 5th round ? I'm sorry if we go into the season with Adam's and Sercy as our starters it's a fail. 

 

10 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I don't understand the infatuation with Hurst. He hasn't played competitive football for that long and is 25 already. 

This year's TE class is very weak. 

We would be better off singing a veteran stopgap for a year then addressing the problem next year when hopefully the class is better and we can get a solid player at pick 32

Here is how I view it: You go best TE or S available in the second. That's why I mentioned Justin Reid would be the pick if he fell to 55. I just think it is more likely Hurst is there than Reid. After the draft is usually when round 2, I guess you could call it, of free agency begins. Teams sometimes make cuts based on their picks and you can re-evaluate your roster with the new draft picks added. Right now the free agent safety market is pretty stout in comparison to the tight end market. I think we would be better off drafting a tight end and signing another veteran safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...