Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Richardson group should pay PSL owners


Squirrel

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, grateflday said:

Hopefully you won't have to worry about this.  I am a PSL owner myself, since 2002, and really don't think there will be a new stadium any time soon.  Despite its "age" the current stadium was built in a modern era way in that it has a lot of suites and lots of club seats, who also have a very nice indoor area to lounge and concessions.  There is also room inside to do more, plus the location is great, etc.  

AS it relates to not being able to support a new location.  Despite every game being sold out, if you go every Sunday you see all the empty seats.... SO we still have a fan base that wont buy single game tickets from others and then your going to ask 50k people to spend another $3k to $10k+ for a PSL of which we already spent that kind of money??  Not going to happen.  The fan base isn't here that can do that, there is no waiting list and not a large number of people try to get tickets as it is.  

This all being said,,,,, I won't be a peace until we have new owners and a new long term lease signed at the current place :shades:

No way PSLs for a new stadium would be priced at $3-10K. Those are 1990's prices. My guess is double that at least. I have owned a couple since the first year. I got my moneys worth over the years with the memories. I won't buy them again. Its too easy to get tickets online now a days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a little late, but I think I have an idea!

Instead of giving PSL owners money, they should give that money to Hurney so he can go out and get any free agent we want!

With all of the free agent threads earlier this month, I'm actually surprised this wasn't suggested earlier.

For those that couldn't tell, I'm being sarcastic. This is a dumb idea. It's like saying Samsung was sold and, since I own a Samsung TV, the purchasing company should give me money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

right...as long as  you know you have no rights...stealing

I don't see much difference in this and a cell phone account.  Your original contract paid for the right to use "your" phone number, but you have to continue to pay the service amount (whatever the provider decides that is this year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PantherCam213 said:

I don't see much difference in this and a cell phone account.  Your original contract paid for the right to use "your" phone number, but you have to continue to pay the service amount (whatever the provider decides that is this year).

How every you want to justify it bruh...its always stacked against the consumer....thats why i dont have a PSL...pimping legalized...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Asurfaholic said:

It’s an absurd idea.

of course they wouldn’t part with that kind of money there’s not even a question of whether or not the PSL owners are owed the money. This is looney and sounds like a bunch of entitled liberals to me. 

 

THE PSL WAS NOT AN INVESTMENT. It was a purchase of a license to have first dibs on a seat in a stadium.

 

PSL OWNERS DO NOT OWN ANY PORTION OF THE PANTHERS

 

NOBODY OWES THE PSL OWNERS ANYTHING.

Call Rush Limbaugh for your bs rants. I dont care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...