Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rashaad Penny vs. Nick Chubb

Woodie

By Woodie,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
Posted

Since we have shown little too no interest in any of the RB’s on the FA market, I am beginning to think we will target one early.  Now, the first round is far too rich…especially after spending a high first on one last year.  However, I definitely see one taken with our second or one of our third round picks (I know many don’t think we should use a second on a RB, but the way this team values the position, I think they will want to get their guy rather than wait for whomever is left)

 

Anyway, the two most likely candidates IMO are Rashaad Penny and Nick Chubb (I don’t think there is a chance in Hell that either Michel or Guice will be there for our second round pick).  Both seem destined for that mid-second to mid-third range to be taken.  So, if we really want either, there is a very good chance both could be off the board by the time we pick in the third…particularly with the resurgence of the running game throughout the league.

 

So, I decided to look at some clips from Draft Breakdown to see how they compare to each other.   Anyway, here goes!

 

Vision:  Both have good vision, but Penny’s seems a little better.  He was very quick to diagnose the hole and explode through it.  Chubb also seems to have decent vision, but it takes him a fraction longer to identify the hole than Penny.

Advantage: Penny

 

Power:  Both do a good job of breaking tackles and running through arm tackles, but Chubb just seems to be better at moving the pile when the defense swarms to him.

Advantage: Chubb

 

Speed:  Penny has a clear advantage here.  Forget the combine, in pads Penny just has more explosion and plays much faster than Chubb does…particularly his short area speed.  When Penny sees a hole, he just explodes through it, while it takes Chubb a fraction of a second longer, which leads to some holes closing up on him before he gets there.

Advantage Penny

 

Quickness:  Again, I think Penny is better at changing direction at the point of attack and is quicker at bouncing it outside when there’s nothing up the middle.

Advantage: Penny

 

Blocking:  Neither had many opportunities to block in the games I saw, but the few times they did, Chubb seems more comfortable at it.  Chubb did a much better job of squaring up and impacting the defender, while the most you could say about Penny is that he tried to get in the way.  IMO, Penny’s big problem is that he uses virtually no blocking technique.  I don’t know if that’s because he doesn’t have the want to, or if it’s because nobody ever really taught him since he was always the feature back.  Either way, we all know how Rivera likes his RB’s to be able to block, so Penny really needs to show a desire to learn to be a consideration here.

Advantage: Chubb

 

Receiving: Neither had many opportunities to catch balls, but Penny did get quite a bit more than Chubb.  For the most part, Penny worked well out of the backfield and caught the ball well as an outlet, but I wouldn’t expect him to line up in the slot or outside like CMC.  Generally, he looks to be a decent receiver.  Chubb, on the other hand, went out on a few routes, but didn’t have any balls thrown to him, so, I couldn’t get a real gauge on him as a receiver.

Advantage:  Penny

 

Bottom line, both are good backs, but as long as you don’t plan on keeping them in to block very often (at least until they learn better technique), Penny seems to be the much better runner.  In fact, I could see him as this year’s Kareem Hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted

I would really like either one.  Hard as hell for me to choose to be honest,  I think both will be really good players.  Nice breakdown Woodie.  :100_Emoji_42x42:

One small thing to add Penny can return kicks as well.  Complete back IMO.  I love Chubbs toughness and leadership, really tough call. Maybe lean to Penny for many reasons you mentioned, especially speed and quickness.  Penny is a very hard runner too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I would really like either one.  Hard as hell for me to choose to be honest,  I think both will be really good players.  Nice breakdown Woodie.  :100_Emoji_42x42:

One small thing to add Penny can return kicks as well.  Complete back IMO.  I love Chubbs toughness and leadership, really tough call. Maybe lean to Penny for many reasons you mentioned, especially speed and quickness.  Penny is a very hard runner too.

Yeah, I forgot to mention that Penny can return kicks as well.  But I agree that both will be good.  I think either would be a great addition to our offense and compliment CMC very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Wouldn't have a problem with either one of them.

In the 3rd round.

I know you don't like the idea of a RB in the 2nd, but there is a very good chance both will be gone by our first 3rd round pick.  And since I think there is a  pretty big drop-off after them, we may have no other choice if we fall in love with either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Woodie said:

 

I know you don't like the idea of a RB in the 2nd, but there is a very good chance both will be gone by our first 3rd round pick.  And since I think there is a  pretty big drop-off after them, we may have no other choice if we fall in love with either.

I'd rather not. I think there's enough depth in the RB class that there will be viable options there for us in the 3rd. Last year, 5 RBs were off the board by the time we'd be on the clock with our first 3rd rounder. Kareem Hunt would've still been available. Maybe one or both of Penny and Chubb will be gone by then. Oh well. I'd bet decent money that someone like Royce Freeman, Kerryon Johnson, and/or Ronald Jones II will be there.

The one wildcard RB for me in the 2nd would be Sony Michel. If he's there, he'd be hard not to draft. I don't think he will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd rather not. I think there's enough depth in the RB class that there will be viable options there for us in the 3rd. Last year, 5 RBs were off the board by the time we'd be on the clock with our first 3rd rounder. Kareem Hunt would've still been available. Maybe one or both of Penny and Chubb will be gone by then. Oh well. I'd bet decent money that someone like Royce Freeman, Kerryon Johnson, and/or Ronald Jones II will be there.

The one wildcard RB for me in the 2nd would be Sony Michel. If he's there, he'd be hard not to draft. I don't think he will be.

I get that, but I just see a bigger drop-off than you do.  Yes, there's depth, but I think both of these guys have much more potential to be impactful than anyone left.  And Jones is even smaller than McCaffrey, so I don't think he fits as a compliment at all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Woodie said:

I get that, but I just see a bigger drop-off than you do.  Yes, there's depth, but I think both of these guys have much more potential to be impactful than anyone left.  And Jones is even smaller than McCaffrey, so I don't think he fits as a compliment at all.  

You just never know how things will work out. Obviously, no one thought Kareem Hunt was going to be what he ended up being or he wouldn't have lasted until late into the 3rd. Same with Kamara who went early in the 3rd. 

I mean, I'm not gonna throw a fit if we take a Penny or a Chubb in the 2nd round, but I'd definitely prefer to spread the draft investment wealth after just spending the #8 overall pick on that position a year ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You just never know how things will work out. Obviously, no one thought Kareem Hunt was going to be what he ended up being or he wouldn't have lasted until late into the 3rd. Same with Kamara who went early in the 3rd. 

I mean, I'm not gonna throw a fit if we take a Penny or a Chubb in the 2nd round, but I'd definitely prefer to spread the draft investment wealth after just spending the #8 overall pick on that position a year ago.

Oh, I don't disagree that I would much rather wait until the 3rd for a back, but the way the team has ignored the position in FA leads me to think it's much higher on the wish list than some might think.  I have a feeling they are having visions of a Kamara/Ingram type of impact for us this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jumpman910 Contributor

jumpman910

Posted
Posted

I know many are high on Sony but he has a fundamental issue with fumbling the football that is even more glaring when you consider he's splitting carries with Chubb. 

Sony fumbles once ever 50 carries while Penny fumbles once every 105 carries. This is a Stat that follows a running back to the NFL. For example Kareem Hunt never fumbled in college and only did once this year on his very first NFL carry. Whereas Mixon fumbles every 73 carries in college and every 69 carries in the pros.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mikey815 Newbie

Mikey815

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Woodie said:

Oh, I don't disagree that I would much rather wait until the 3rd for a back, but the way the team has ignored the position in FA leads me to think it's much higher on the wish list than some might think.  I have a feeling they are having visions of a Kamara/Ingram type of impact for us this year.

Royce Freeman is a strong inside runner and would be a good short yardage grinder. Maybe available from round 3 to 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

I know many are high on Sony but he has a fundamental issue with fumbling the football that is even more glaring when you consider he's splitting carries with Chubb. 

Sony fumbles once ever 50 carries while Penny fumbles once every 105 carries. This is a Stat that follows a running back to the NFL. For example Kareem Hunt never fumbled in college and only did once this year on his very first NFL carry. Whereas Mixon fumbles every 73 carries in college and every 69 carries in the pros.

 

In general, I agree with you. However last year I wrote off Kamara for his ball security issues but obviously this hasn't been an issue in the pro's.

Why? I don't know. Some players can be coached on that problem and some can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • electro's horse
      Dave Tepper gives Canales and Dan Morgan vote of confidence

      By electro's horse · Posted

      Here comes Frankw and his pathetic little persecution complex to claim I have a personal vendetta against one of the worst performing coaches in the league if anything I should love Canales because he’s walking proof that through the lord all things AREN'T possible.  This kind of performance is exactly what you’d expect from someone who filled the building with misunderstood Bible quotes about iron forging iron and inspired speeches about how he apologized for his infidelity by buying his wife a book deal.  once more into the breech dear friends, just like when I paid a stripper for an above the pants hand job in Orlando. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Has this game changed feelings about Young?

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      As dumb as it probably sounds, we should have won that game.  Defense was bad but Bryce should have been better.  Pass rush isn't a good enough excuse.
    • frankw
      Dave Tepper gives Canales and Dan Morgan vote of confidence

      By frankw · Posted

      You and I both know there isn't a coach we could or can still hire that can "fix" Bryce Young. Even at mighty Alabama with one of the best modern coaches in college football history Mac Jones was still a better QB than Bryce Young. Mac Jones.... We already know how you feel about Canales on a personal level so in that regard you wanting him fired is not news. You don't have to disguise it behind this shroud of rabble about not fixing Bryce Young. To his credit he somehow had us competive against the Chiefs and the Eagles on the road with #9. But no coaching staff can overcome their starting QB turning the ball over 4 times. We definitely have developed some of our younger offensive pieces. And as far as Evero goes he has earned criticism and if he's fired so be it but in his defense many of us said in the offseason this defensive roster was a disaster waiting to happen given the resources we spent on the offense while neglecting the defense. That was Dan Morgan's plan. He swung too hard toward offense to salvage the Bryce Young trade. That's on him. We can scream about XL all we want but at least he's actually been on the field for the most part. The Brooks pick was a luxury pick at the time and now it is a Hurney level blunder. Dan Morgan has gotten a lot of early praise here when in reality he's unequivocally deserving of significant criticism. But if you say that some people get up in arms because he's a former Panther. Big whoop. He has just as much to prove this upcoming season as Canales. That's why to me in my own personal opinion I say one more season and then if it's more of the same say goodbye to both.
×
×
  • Create New...