Sorensen says we should sign Reid, and he's right.

[AggieLean]

1 hour ago, bull123 said:

I doubt it

Nah, I’m pretty confident a lot of companies wouldn’t make a big stink. Only ones causing drama would be the people like you in the office who’d run and whine to senior management about someone sitting during the anthem. It would be employees like you who’d make it to where the company would just decide to scrap the pledge or Banner being played all together.

Good thing our jobs don’t require us to have to listen or go through the pledge or banner..

[Jangler]

 

 

[Ace_Aladdin]

22 minutes ago, bull123 said:

I find it comical that the kneelers are accusing the rest of us of causing drama

im done with this

@bull123    ----> real flag 

 

 

 

 

CK's flag 

---------> 

 

[Ace_Aladdin]

Owners can't enforce their political beliefs on players no matter how rich or white they are.

Their objection to players kneeling is siding with one of the political views aka violation of 1A.

They will lose in the court deservely. 

Racist ppl will hate on as always 

[MtnProwler]

3 hours ago, Ace_Aladdin said:

Owners can't enforce their political beliefs on players no matter how rich or white they are.

Their objection to players kneeling is siding with one of the political views aka violation of 1A.

They will lose in the court deservely. 

Racist ppl will hate on as always 

There's so much wrong with your polarizing posts. I'm not going to assume anyone's intention based only on their religion, race, or class, as you've decided to do. 

There is a difference in belief/view and action. You're right, your racists views are protected but taking racist action is not in almost all cases. Action will always be debated according to public policy and opinion.

Again, I agree with Ray Lewis in this article, I believe and support the cause just not that specific strategic move. From your post, I already know that you aren't going to be very accepting of any one else's views but your own. But I thought I'd put this out there for others' sake. It doesn't make Ray or I to be those things that you are trying to paint us to be with your posts in this thread.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ray-lewis-ravens-refused-to-sign-colin-kaepernick-because-of-girlfriends-tweet/

 

I apologize to others, I can't believe I was baited back in to this.

[Ace_Aladdin]

45 minutes ago, MtnProwler said:

There's so much wrong with your polarizing posts. I'm not going to assume anyone's intention based only on their religion, race, or class, as you've decided to do. 

There is a difference in belief/view and action. You're right, your racists views are protected but taking racist action is not in almost all cases. Action will always be debated according to public policy and opinion.

Again, I agree with Ray Lewis in this article, I believe and support the cause just not that specific strategic move. From your post, I already know that you aren't going to be very accepting of any one else's views but your own. But I thought I'd put this out there for others' sake. It doesn't make Ray or I to be those things that you are trying to paint us to be with your posts in this thread.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ray-lewis-ravens-refused-to-sign-colin-kaepernick-because-of-girlfriends-tweet/

 

I apologize to others, I can't believe I was baited back in to this.

WTF are you talking about, when this goes to court NFL will lose. 

Please try to read the U.S. Constitution for once, not CBS sports . 

 

[MtnProwler]

1 hour ago, Ace_Aladdin said:

WTF are you talking about, when this goes to court NFL will lose. 

Please try to read the U.S. Constitution for once, not CBS sports . 

 

I think I understand your confusion. You can't just read the Bill of Rights and be done. It's not the end all document that you think it is.

You do know what Congress does right? They establish laws and acts that give direction on the Bill of Rights. They give instruction on the rights written in the BOR when it's deemed necessary for the best interest in public policy and security, based on tested cases. One can't simply stop at reading the BOR but needs to see what acts and laws that Congress has passed since then to understand what's lawful and what's not. When you research this, you'll find the private sector industries have been given great control in regards to what their employees can and can't do so long that it doesn't violate anti-discrimination, employment, whistleblower, or local laws. It's pretty interesting to read and understand.

Even then, one could argue that for the same reason one has a right to kneel another has a right to disagree on that action, as Ray Lewis did in my previous post, when it's done within legal bounds of the law. It's important to note, disagreeing on the action doesn't mean you disagree on the purpose.

Based on your posts I know this isn't what you wanted to hear but hopefully it helps.

[rayzor]

This ain't about football anymore. Same ol arguing over the same ol thing accomplishing the same ol thing with people reading too much into other people's opinions and making judgments on their character based on their opinion on a single issue.

Weak sauce. closing thread.