Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is our secondary actually any worse?

Eazy-E

By Eazy-E,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Ptsd about what? I’m sorry you aren’t able to share opinions in a reasonable manner.

I'm not the one making statements like I know what I'm talking about.  You seem to want validation so I'm sorry you can't handle differing opinions.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

The ol’ eye tests tells me Seymour can’t defend against a lumbering log.

I don’t think he is saying he can. Just that Worley couldn’t cover either. Both Worley and Seymour are bad at coverage so we aren’t any WORSE with Seymour there isn’t of Worley. The good news is we have Elder healthy and obviously are looking at better options... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

Good to see your character assessments are the same as your GM assessments. Garbage 

Been right way more than you and never acted like I had "sources"..

Remember that ??? When you had sources but everybody found out you're just a lying bitch craving for attention on a football forum...

I know how pathetic were you??? Lol.. Now you're trying this condescending prick thing... Good for you sweet heart..

Hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NJPanthers12 Proficient

NJPanthers12

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Been right way more than you and never acted like I had "sources"..

Remember that ??? When you had sources but everybody found out you're just a lying bitch craving for attention on a football forum...

I know how pathetic were you??? Lol.. Now you're trying this condescending prick thing... Good for you sweet heart..

Hahaha

Once again talking about something you have no idea about. Only condescending to those who clearly have no clue what they are talking about. You just happen to be one of the few on that list. You're really crushing it on the internet tough guy act. Good for you sweet heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eazy-E Mentor

Eazy-E

Posted
  • Author
Posted
27 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not the one making statements like I know what I'm talking about.  You seem to want validation so I'm sorry you can't handle differing opinions.   

Once again making assumptions instead of just answering the question. Why not just reply with the how and why the secondary is so much worse? We’re on a football message board. No one here is a professional. You also never explained the ptsd comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

It's indisputably worse right now. 

This is exactly why I wasn't a fan of getting rid of a young CB for a guy who was on the verge of getting cut. 

offseason is far from over, but losing Breeland really, really hurt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eazy-E Mentor

Eazy-E

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I don’t think he is saying he can. Just that Worley couldn’t cover either. Both Worley and Seymour are bad at coverage so we aren’t any WORSE with Seymour there isn’t of Worley. The good news is we have Elder healthy and obviously are looking at better options... 

Nice to see someone with reading comprehension skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Seoul_Panther Newbie

Seoul_Panther

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Eazy-E said:

Kurt Coleman and Daryl Worley were fuging awful last season. You guys may disagree with me but I can just go by the eye test and what I saw play out on the field. 

  I agree that Coleman was terrible. Smart move by him to go to the only team where he will never have to tackle Kamara. Worley frequently looked outmatched in coverage but I thought he was a superior tackler to Bradberry who seems to get a free pass around here because of his rookie season.

The safety market for free agency is moving slow and there are still 3 or 4 guys out there who would be upgrades to Coleman. I don’t even think Colin Jones would have been any better or worse, that’s how bad Coleman was.

  Its not too late but even if the holes are plugged it doesn't speak very well of advance planning. Creating holes is sort of the opposite of what I had hoped for. Worley was also a cheap starter. Its an inditement that after 2 rookie years his worth as an asset is deemed equal to Smith. I will feel happier if Gunter returns.

So yeah overall i look at it as we lost 2 first team starters and as of now we don't have their replacements. As much as they were frequent liabilities, right now we are worse in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...