Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Source: Panthers reached out to Allen Hurns and are interested.

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Ship Collaborator

Ship

Posted
Posted

how many WRs are we gonna get?

Funch is staying, Wright is staying, Samuel is staying (though apparently we're not acting very confident about his usage this season).

Everyone else can be cut. Though, I gotta think Torrey Smith sticks around.

What is this saying about our squad?

Funch/Hurns/Wright

Funch/Smith/Wright

Funch/Smith/Hurns

Hurns/Funch/Wright

Funch/Hurns/Samuel

Funch/Smith/Samuel

Funch/Samuel/Smith

Funch/Hurns/Samuel

I'm not sure I'm getting it. Though, adding Hurns could be good. We've been needing to make real moves at WR for a while and this is a real overhaul-- Smith and Wright aren't WR1s, but they're legit WRs who have roles, as opposed to people like Clay or Shepherd. I feel like we're gonna see a strangely quality WR core at the end of this transformation, though right now the amount of WRs we're working with feels frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boney Rookie

boney

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

I was going to ask the same thing. I do not know much about Hurns, is he a vertical threat like Torrey? If he’s not, maybe they keep both?

He ran like a 4.55 or something if I recall correctly. Def not a burner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anybodyhome
      Canes vs Bruins 7pm Halloween Edition!

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • Jackie Lee
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...