Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jarius Wright will be like a younger Cotchery


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

It cute you think Wright is some missing piece. He couldn’t even beat out Treadwell LMAO

NAH I just enjoy watching ppl who Don't know poo about football giving their opinion on a player ..lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

NAH I just enjoy watching ppl who Don't know poo about football giving their opinion on a player ..lol

I’ve pretty much been right in every WR we’ve signed 

 

I bet you thought Shepard would be good also LMAO 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

I’ve pretty much been right in every WR we’ve signed 

 

I bet you thought Shepard would be good also LMAO 

Nope Shepard had no history like Wright does... You see buddy  I can see a player with solid to good hands, can get open, and has experience being good for Cam.. I look at skill set and a history of showing those skill sets to make my opinion.. Not stats or what he did on another team with a history of bad QB play...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He may be similar to crochery but he is a lot faster. I believe Wright has about 4.42 40 time, 4.39 on his pro day.

Cotchery could catch and run routes but was really slow, especially because he was older. 

 

Wright may have lost some of that speed but then again he may have not. If he has lost a step I believe he will still be considered fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

Yeah y'all crazy if this guy was so good he would have been on the field all the time LMAO. I mean he was under Treadwell and he sucked big time. Just another scrap pickup for cheap. Cam needs to keep calling out this sorry front office.

I don't think anybody is saying he is great.. But if you took the time and stop letting what the Vikings did with him form your opinion.. You can see a player with skill sets you need on this team...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a guy who was at State when Cotch was there and actually watched the man play football for the majority of his career.  He wasn't really ever a burner, but ran great routes, had dependable hands and was always where the QB expected him to be.  He and Rivers were a match made in heaven when they were in college.  

Wright is basically the same guy.  He is going to catch a lot of footballs this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Nope Shepard had no history like Wright does... You see buddy  I can see a player with solid to good hands, can get open, and has experience being good for Cam.. I look at skill set and a history of showing those skill sets to make my opinion.. Not stats or what he did on another team with a history of bad QB play...

What history does Wright have? his best seasons was barely over 500 yards, the last two seasons he doesn’t even have 400 yards combined.

 

He couldn’t beat out Treadwell, in a Vikings team that was willing to start an UDFA as their number 2, so you know he had opportunity after opportunity.

 

Its actually disrespectful of me to compare him to Avant, Avant was twice the receiver Wright is. 

With Mccaffrey and Olsen, Wright will be irrelevant 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

What history does Wright have? his best seasons was barely over 500 yards, the last two seasons he doesn’t even have 400 yards combined.

 

He couldn’t beat out Treadwell, in a Vikings team that was willing to start an UDFA as their number 2, so you know he had opportunity after opportunity.

 

Its actually disrespectful of me to compare him to Avant, Avant was twice the receiver Wright is. 

With Mccaffrey and Olsen, Wright will be irrelevant 

You are a fool.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

What history does Wright have? his best seasons was barely over 500 yards, the last two seasons he doesn’t even have 400 yards combined.

 

He couldn’t beat out Treadwell, in a Vikings team that was willing to start an UDFA as their number 2, so you know he had opportunity after opportunity.

 

Its actually disrespectful of me to compare him to Avant, Avant was twice the receiver Wright is. 

With Mccaffrey and Olsen, Wright will be irrelevant 

Sheppard didn't even have that... And again stop telling me what happen in another teams system with sub par QB's most of his career.. If you can't see his hands, speed and ability to move the chains.. Not my fault .. Go take a class or something..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Sheppard didn't even have that... And again stop telling me what happen in another teams system with sub par QB's most of his career.. If you can't see his hands, speed and ability to move the chains.. Not my fault .. Go take a class or something..

I've found in my short time that this is the most unintelligent group of people on a message board that I've ever seen.  I can't even read half of the replies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...