Wilson or Ebron? Who would you rather have?

[stirs]

Who will play for vet minimum cause that is about all we have left

[LinvilleGorge]

I'd probably pick Wilson because he's the better blocker, probably the safer bet, and he'd probably be cheaper. But, Ebron's potentially is certainly intriguing and if working with Olsen could get him to live up to his billing then he could legit be Olsen's successor where as I think Wilson is who he is - a #2 TE. Gotta remember, Ebron is still only 24 years old despite having been in the NFL for 4 seasons already. Definitely not too late for the light to come on for him.

[*FreeFua*]

1 minute ago, stirs said:

Who will play for vet minimum cause that is about all we have left

There is plenty of money left with the right structuring 

[stirs]

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

There is plenty of money left with the right structuring 

The Hurney way

[NcPsa10]

 

./

[unicar15]

I’d rather have the more talented guy from the poo show organization rather than the less talented guy from one of the best run organizations in the league. 

[KDawg004]

I rather have Ebron. The potential is there. I think with Wilson what you see is what you get. For all the hate on Ebron, his numbers are respectable. I’ll take that from a #4 option all day. That’s essentially what he will be for us.

[LinvilleGorge]

10 minutes ago, KDawg004 said:

I rather have Ebron. The potential is there. I think with Wilson what you see is what you get. For all the hate on Ebron, his numbers are respectable. I’ll take that from a #4 option all day. That’s essentially what he will be for us.

Yeah, it's not like he's been bad, it's just that he was expected to great.

[KDawg004]

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, it's not like he's been bad, it's just that he was expected to great.

Exactly. He hasn’t lived up to the hype so everyone sh*ts on him. But if he were a 3rd round pick everyone would be clamoring for this signing.

He would be the #2 TE and maybe he can learn a thing or two from Olsen. It’s not like Ed Dickson was much of a blocker or receiver anyways. This should be an upgrade.

[Shocker]

Id keep Manhertz.  Are these guys that much of an upgrade?  Dickson is better than them all.

[The Lobo]

Have TEs ever performed well in Detroit under the Stafford era? Maybe it wasn’t ALL on him.

[LinvilleGorge]

11 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Id keep Manhertz.  Are these guys that much of an upgrade?  Dickson is better than them all.

No.

[davos]

I'd go with Willson but I really don't think it will be as big of an upgrade from a receiving standpoint compared to Dickson.  Dickson has been sh*t on but I thought he played fine for the role asked of him.  He helped us out way more than he f*cked up.  Same can not be said for many TEs and receivers that have found their way through his orgnization.  

I'll be optimistic if we wind up with Ebron but I have reservations about him.  Funny enough, that game last year when Dickson went ham for like 150, Ebron had like 3 drops including one should be touchdown.  

[Snake]

Both are a good fit but Wilson would be my first choice. He is a good blocker and would add a extra wrinkle to CMC being on the field.