Which running back do you want?

[cheynehowell]

7 minutes ago, Monty83 said:

I would try to trade our 24 and 55 to Cleveland for their 32 and 34, particularly if they have someone at the bottom they want to secure. Outside of one or two guys we might target in the first, I don't really see a ton of guys in the groups we're looking at where NONE of them would be available early 2nd. But there are some situations where none of them might be available by the time we pick in the 2nd.

If you like Reid or Harrison at safety, you COULD get one at 24, but you might miss both at 55.

If you like Michel, Guice, Chubb, or Freeman at RB, you can definitely get one at 24, but you MIGHT miss on them all at 55.

If you like Kirk, Moore, or Washington at WR, you can get one at 24, but all may be gone by 55.

If you like Hernandez or Price at OL, you get the drift....

Trading back to the top of the 2nd, because we're not looking for one particular stud is pretty much the safest move, and we have a chance to secure at least 1 guy in 2 separate groups above.

 

Man would love to secure Michel and Kirk at 32,34 and sign Mathieu. Perfect scenario But I think 32 and 34.

[Rick Grimes]

Guice or Michel. Would love to slide back in the early 2nd for them if it works out.

[manu4t]

20 hours ago, AU-panther said:

Kalen Ballage or Scarbrough in the third, that way we can use our 1st and 2nd on some combination of DE, safety, or Guard.  If we decide to draft on in the first I like Guice.

This ^ 

Guice is a beast if he is on the board in the second I have to think he is near or at the top of our Board.  I could live with Michel in the late second/third rd or Chubb in the third rd.  Kerryon Johnson in the late third or fourth is another one I wouldnt be upset with either.

[Riv]

Jaylen Samuels.

[Mikey815]

15 hours ago, heel31ok said:

no , he is a different position...

So cmc thinks he’s a rb but what position do u think he should play?