Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your ideal/dream WR group post-draft & FA


davos

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Snake said:

Yeah I think you are wrong. Funchess proved last year he is good enough under a OC who's game plan involved two crayons and a coloring book. 

Not to mention he was playing injured half the season. People give Funchess so much flack but the kid had to carry the WR group his rookie year, wasn't used enough his sophomore year, and played injured most of last year when he finally got KB's targets. Not to mention he's still only 24. The kid needs some slack. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ncfan said:

1. Funchess

2. Watkins

3. Samuel

4. Bryd

 

TE

1. Olsen

2. Dallas Goedert

 

Good balance of deep and big underneath guys

x 2

 

1. Watkins 

2. Funchess/CMC

3. Samuel

4. Bryd

 

TE

1. Olsen

2. Dallas Goedert

RB: Nick Chubb, CMC & CAP

 

TEs/RBs are like peanutbutter & jelly

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

worst post ever. Funny thing about this post you cant even provide stats/facts to support your claim. what a joke.

lol butt hurt much? 

The last 3 weeks of the regular season and that drop in the end zone in the playoffs is all anyone should need to see. 

But the Funchess homers on this board always have an excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Watkins

2.Robinson

3.Ridley

4.Funchess

5.Byrd

6.Samuel

RB Cmac, Chubb

Avg. season score will be 59-58 as I've cut most of the defensive players and some weeks we will only field 10 guys. Cam throws for 6k and we get blown out in the wild card round. Disappointing but one hell of a ride. Amirite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

By catching the ball over top of them. Robinson competes for the ball as well as anyone in the NFL. That's a big thing we're missing with no KB. Don't let his 40 time fool you, Robinson is much faster in and out of breaks than KB and Funchess.

It's still not going to open up our run game. It's basically a better KB and Funchess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UpstatePanther said:

Not to mention he was playing injured half the season. People give Funchess so much flack but the kid had to carry the WR group his rookie year, wasn't used enough his sophomore year, and played injured most of last year when he finally got KB's targets. Not to mention he's still only 24. The kid needs some slack. 

He got what he really needed and that's a real OC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll go with just 5 since that is what we typically carry on the 53.

Starting outside receivers:  Funchess and Watkins(or Robinson)

Back up outside receiver: Ridley if he falls or Gallup later

Starting slot: Samuel

Back up slot: Bryd

Cheaper version with no draft picks used:

Starting outside receivers:  Funchess and Wallace or Lee

Back up outside receiver: Cheap vet

Starting slot: Samuel

Back up slot: Bryd

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

lol butt hurt much? 

The last 3 weeks of the regular season and that drop in the end zone in the playoffs is all anyone should need to see. 

But the Funchess homers on this board always have an excuse.

you know I was drunk when I wrote that - and I still agree with it. The dude was playing with a separated shoulder. No homer-ism here.

Fun balled out when healthy as #1. Your Samuel "couldnt catch a cold" - there are more stats showing he could catch, rather than couldnt. Although the sample set is small - we dont have enough to say whether he can or can not catch the ball.

 

If anything all you demonstrated in your post is how little you pay attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...