Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person: Panthers aren't interested in Landry

TN05

By TN05,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Trill OG Newbie

Trill OG

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, top dawg said:

I never really believed it anyway.  It made absolutely zero sense.  I said it before that Hurney wants speed and Norv likes bigger receivers,  and Landry didn't check either box.  Plus, his contract will likely be inflated as juxtaposed against his efficiency and/or production. 

Thanks,  SMarty!

Speed/bigger receivers my top 3 targets imo will be Sammy Watkins/Martavis Bryant/Terrell Pryor.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
steven8989 Newbie

steven8989

Posted
Posted

Yes so we won't get beat up Watkins because he will be staying in LA with that trade. Don't want a another Ginn with Mike Wallace and don't want Pryor because he is a garbage wr(one year wonder)!!!! We need someone that can't catch the ball CONSISTENTLY!!!!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted

Joe Schad of the Palm Beach Post listed the Bears, Browns, Ravens and 49ers as teams interested in acquiring Jarvis Landry.

The Bears and Ravens had previously been linked to Landry while the Browns and 49ers are new suitors. Cleveland should have more than enough cap space to accommodate Landry at his $16.2 million salary while the Niners would be wise to add a pass-catcher for Jimmy Garoppolo. The Dolphins were already over the cap when they acquired Robert Quinn from the Rams on Friday and will be in dire straits if they don't move Landry before the start of free agency. Miami probably regrets tagging Landry and may rescind the tag if his trade market dries up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why I Believe That We Will Trade Down

      By Martin · Posted

      I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...