Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why is the sale of the team taking so long?


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, La Pantera said:

He's talking about the sale of a minority share of the Titans.....

 

Even so, I was just bringing up an example with the Titans. He wants to argue semantics, when the original point I made, which answers his original question, it that the process takes time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me just clarify I know that the actual “sale” will take time. It’s not like some guy is going to waltz in, throw some money down, shake hands and bam, new owner.

I should have made it more clear that I am just wondering why it is so quite. The sale of a sports franchise is usually a pretty big deal and often times publicly reported. Maybe the NBA is different but I am basing my opinion around that since way more NBA teams have been sold in the past 5 to 10 years than the NFL. Something like 10 to 3.

Take the bills for example. Trump wanted to buy the Bills but was out bid by the eventual new owners. This was very public and trump would often tweet about it. (What a surprise) I would say P Diddy is a close comparison to this but Diddy doesn’t have anywhere near the money to be taken seriously. The only other person to come out and say anything is Felix Sebates and he won’t say who the actual buyer is who heads his group.

tldr: Yes I know this will take time I am just wondering why it is being kept a secret. Shouldn’t we at least have some statements or something from legit people who want to make a bid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

Only a 3rd of the team is being sold and it is not for controlling power of the team. I doubt many people would want to spend 500+ million dollars and have no control over what they just purchased. 

Incorrect. It has been announced since almost the beginning that the WHOLE team is up for sale. Not just Richardson’s part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jbland said:

Incorrect. It has been announced since almost the beginning that the WHOLE team is up for sale. Not just Richardson’s part. 

I was referring to the Titans. Someone mentioned that the titans have been up for sale for a few years now. Only a third of the Titans are for sale and it is a non controlling third. So pretty much they are looking for a very large investor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...