Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A good time of year for Props......


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

I don't think many of you realize how nice it is to have a forum like the Carolina Huddle.  This forum is top of the line.  All teams have forums and some have multiply forums but none of them are as good as this one. (might be as good but none better)

I stumbled into this forum when I was a member of the Charlotte Observer's Panther Forum page, which they eventually dropped more than 10 years ago.  I believe it was 2003 or 2004 when I joined.  I think it was the Huddle (Huddle or Observer only Panther forums I belonged to) that had numbers assigned to the registered poster.   I had one that had 33 on it.  Whether it was the Huddle I cannot remember.  CRS syndrome kicks in more frequently these days.

We have had the pleasure of some insanely good posters here.   Many brought some great conversations and through the years they have come and gone.  

ZOD/JEREMY I personally thank you for this forum.   As a person that has works overseas most of the past 15 years this forum has been a stress relief spot for me.

Those that are new, you don't know how really good it is to have this forum.  It is easy to maneuver through and for the most part has some really good topics. 

 

Thanks Jeremy

Keep Pounding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I feel that this was more pep talk for Jeremy than anything else.  Some of his threads lately have been somewhat covert cries for help.   A few thread titles:

So....

Hi there

Know the warning signs, people!  Jeremy, we are here for you. We are excellent listeners. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...