Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any Chance the Hurney Decision Comes Back to Bite Rivera?

Toker Smurf

By Toker Smurf,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

If we have a 6 to 8 win season or so, maybe not.

Less than that though, and yeah, Rivera is probably in danger. And it wouldn't necessarily have to do with Hurney.

This season to come is basically everybody's audition for their jobs. Expect a fair number of front office people to be gone anyway because, thanks to Richardson, some of them are doing job they're not qualified for.

As far as coaches, make no mistake: If they fail to impress in their audition season, they're gone.

If we don't find a way to sign Norwell it could quite happen. Putting just some one besides Matt Kalil is going to blow up. If Ryan Kalil gets hurt as well oh boy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Holiday Veteran

Doc Holiday

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Udogg said:

Coaches campaign for players sometimes too... do they get fired if the player sucks?  Not saying Rivera won't get fired, but it will probably have nothing to do with Hurney and more to do with how the team performs. 

 

This, people need to stop watching too much day time TV yo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toker Smurf Experienced

Toker Smurf

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

This, people need to stop watching too much day time TV yo

I guess I just think differently. I've been in management for almost 20 years now (during the day, so no soaps)  and I've had a lot of people ask me to help them get a job, where I work (different companies) . If I don't think they will be a good employee, I won't put in a good word for them. I don't want my workplace dragged down by underperformers and I don't want it to reflect badly on me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Holiday Veteran

Doc Holiday

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Cam El said:

I guess I just think differently. I've been in management for almost 20 years now and I've had a lot of people ask me to help them get a job, where I work (different companies) . If I don't think they will be a good employee, I won't put in a good word for them. I don't want my workplace dragged down by underperformers and I don't want it to reflect badly on me. 

That comes more will if they will trust your judgement next time around or not, but nobody is going to fire you if you recommend someone and they performed terribly. They are going to fire the person and trust your judgement less the next go around.

people be trippin if they think the other way around happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toker Smurf Experienced

Toker Smurf

Posted
  • Author
Posted
17 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

That comes more will if they will trust your judgement next time around or not, but nobody is going to fire you if you recommend someone and they performed terribly. They are going to fire the person and trust your judgement less the next go around.

people be trippin if they think the other way around happens

Yeah, people definitely be 'trippin'. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toker Smurf Experienced

Toker Smurf

Posted
  • Author
Posted
54 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Rivera has little to worry about. If the new owners canned him he would have folks lined up to hire him. No matter what folks here think, he has 2 coach of the year awards and a winning record after inheriting a 2-14 team.  

You are absolutely correct. There are a lot of teams in the NFL who would love to be slightly above average. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maddog1945 Apprentice

maddog1945

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Cam El said:

I know this was mostly JR's doings but it's no secret that Rivera wanted Hurney and lobbied for such. When a new owner comes in and get the pulse of things, could this reflect badly on Rivera? After all, he could've pushed for someone with a real background in player evaluation to actually help the team, instead of the 'just the guy' who hired him. and he's comfortable with.

Both will be gone when new owners come in!!

PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bewonee Newbie

bewonee

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nobody.

Talent evaluation is not one of Rivera's strengths. It was Gettleman's, but he still always included Ron on every decision. That's been confirmed by both of them.

You can succeed with one guy who's good at something and one guy who's bad at it. Helps when the guy who's good at it is the one in higher authority.

When both are bad at it, yikes!

Yeah, that would suck. Good thing Hurney has an amazing drafting resume and has drafted almost all of the Panther legends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
On 2/21/2018 at 11:17 AM, Cam El said:

I know this was mostly JR's doings but it's no secret that Rivera wanted Hurney and lobbied for such. When a new owner comes in and get the pulse of things, could this reflect badly on Rivera? After all, he could've pushed for someone with a real background in player evaluation to actually help the team, instead of the 'just the guy' who hired him. and he's comfortable with.

Why would Rivera had chosen somebody else? 

I know the popular opinion around here is that Hurney isn't qualified, and we were better off with somebody else, but OBVIOUSLY the coach feels different. I guess you and others would expect coach to pick a guy he doesn't feel cal do the job - pretty asinine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...