Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Taylor Gabriel?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Would you be open to signing a former nemesis for a mid tier price?  I think here the kind of Sheppard level signing we need to make this offseason to give the wr core a bit of competition. Of course, I haven’t given up on Samuels but a challenge is needed in the field stretching department. That said, this isn’t even a discussion in finding a number 1 or 2 wr, this is just about finding competition for 3. Who know Gabriel I think still has room to grow and could become a 2.

additions need to be made.. what say you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

Yeah the Byrd is the wyrd. 

im all for bringing in a vet WR but it needs to be someone who can compete for one of the top two spots. 

^^^ This .. The guys we sign need to be starting quality competing for the top 2 spots at WR..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I certainly don't see him as any type of need,  just another body who probably wouldn't leapfrog Byrd (as Byrd has been here),  and certainly doesn't have the upside of Samuel. 

He’s a big play deep threat who Cam could do wonders with if they developed solid chemistry... like Ginn. He’s not the most talented deep threat available though so I frankly would only think of him as a fallback option. And I could see Byrd or Samuel being way better than him anyways. But I think he’d have a chance at being what we thought Shep could be last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

Would you be open to signing a former nemesis for a mid tier price?  I think here the kind of Sheppard level signing we need to make this offseason to give the wr core a bit of competition. Of course, I haven’t given up on Samuels but a challenge is needed in the field stretching department. That said, this isn’t even a discussion in finding a number 1 or 2 wr, this is just about finding competition for 3. Who know Gabriel I think still has room to grow and could become a 2.

additions need to be made.. what say you...

It's "Samuel", no S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...