Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers continue to hold out for Hurney


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, stbugs said:

No, you aren’t correct there. Byrd was already on IR after week 4 as was Olsen after week 2. Both came back after KB was traded and both actually missed more time after they came back as well.

So at that point Marty was counting on Samuel who missed most of preseason and had 7 NFL catches at the point of the trade and lasted 2 games post KB, Shepard who clearly sucked, Clay who had 1 NFL catch at that point and Bersin. Counting on Olsen and Byrd was not smart either. Byrd looked good and I like him but he wasn’t around long and Olsen got reinjured the first game back. We were lucky he only missed one more game. 

Sorry, but you are wrong, we had our first and third best receiving options on IR and our second best had been dinged up. It wasn’t a smart move timing wise. It was ridiculously risky for a team that had a shot and it ended up fuging us. 

The injuries that did us in, were after the KB trade. 

Having KB wouldn't have mattered much. 

But once again, don't let the truth get in the way of your bashing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Towelboy said:

I have nothing to gain from fabricating lies about this team. People can choose to believe what they want, but I know what I've been told. Besides, people have already made their minds up about Hurney as GM. I personally subscribe to the notion that he is not the best candidate for the position considering some of the decisions he has made in the past - wanting to trade up for Clausen (which turned out to be the Cam pick), some of the pet projects that didn't pan out, and the contracts given to players on the downside of their career. Just my $0.02.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

So, not interested in facts that might alter your version of things. Not surprised.

As I said I have no reason to believe you or ball boy.  You are an anonymous poster as is ball boy.

  Funny how this little nugget came out from the Deputy US Attorney General shortly after I posted my previous post here about not knowing if ball boy is your alt.

Quote

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Paa Langfart said:

As I said I have no reason to believe you or ball boy.  You are an anonymous poster as is ball boy.

  Funny how this little nugget came out from the Deputy US Attorney General shortly after I posted my previous post here about not knowing if ball boy is your alt.

 

I've been here since 2008. Though I've never met Mr. Scot, I can assure you I'm not him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Paa Langfart said:

As I said I have no reason to believe you or ball boy.  You are an anonymous poster as is ball boy.

  Funny how this little nugget came out from the Deputy US Attorney General shortly after I posted my previous post here about not knowing if ball boy is your alt.

Yeah, I'm sure he was waiting for that.

And honestly dude, given that you're demonstrating brain power roughly equivalent to an ice cube with your posting here, I can't say I care what you believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, I'm sure he was waiting for that.

And honestly dude, given that you're demonstrating brain power roughly equivalent to an ice cube with your posting here, I can't say I care what you believe.

Like so many  here once you fail to prove your point you come up with childish insults to try and bolster your defense. Sorry your Gettleman fantasy  ended - why don't you trot over to the NY Football Giants forum for a fix?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, I'm sure he was waiting for that.

And honestly dude, given that you're demonstrating brain power roughly equivalent to an ice cube with your posting here, I can't say I care what you believe.

Sharing information is less pretentious than challenging the person sharing the info...If you don't want to believe it, fine--don't believe it.

This is a thread on a forum.  It is assumed that you should read with discretion.  This has nothing to do with Russia.  I am pretty sure.  I am not Russian, but then again, I could be, right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Sharing information is less pretentious than challenging the person sharing the info...If you don't want to believe it, fine--don't believe it.

This is a thread on a forum.  It is assumed that you should read with discretion.  This has nothing to do with Russia.  I am pretty sure.  I am not Russian, but then again, I could be, right? 

Well, that one's never exactly been the sharpest knife in the drawer.

I remember reading prior posts thinking it sounded like you knew something from inside. Now I understand why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, The Natural said:

So what I gathered from that post was that somehow Hurney is worse this time around because he kicked the tires around on a third string QB? Really? 

if he kicked those tires far enough, cam newton would be playing for the bills. would you be so forgiving as to give him an open minded 2nd run if that were the case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frash.exe said:

if he kicked those tires far enough, cam newton would be playing for the bills. would you be so forgiving as to give him an open minded 2nd run if that were the case?

I'm not real up on the idea of having a boss that people have to run around preventing from doing something stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, I'm sure he was waiting for that.

And honestly dude, given that you're demonstrating brain power roughly equivalent to an ice cube with your posting here, I can't say I care what you believe.

Hey Scot-lighten up-we can agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...