Super Bowl 52 Thread

[CPF4LIFE]

11 minutes ago, Chairman Wow said:

Wentz's QB rating in his second year was higher than ANY Cam Newton has posted in 7 seasons.

With Peterson's playcalling im sure cam would have done the same. 

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Does he play defense?

Foles played really damn well. The Eagles' ineptitude on defense for the majority of the game is what kept the Pats in the game.

Not denying Foles played well.

But Wentz is better, and hasn't even reached his peak yet.

[Chris1]

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If Wentz had been in that game, the Eagles would have won in a blowout.

They put up 41 points lol, the game was close because the defense couldn't contain the Patriots until the very end of the game it had nothing to do with offense.

[LinvilleGorge]

Just now, Chairman Wow said:

Cam could not run the Eagle's offense. 

His short accuracy and anticipation are among the worst in the league and his decision making is "questionable" to say the least. 

Cam Newton is the reason the Panther's offense did not "evolve" this season.

Why don't you go root for the Eagles then? Cam is gonna be here for a long time, so you might as well find you a new team already.

[LinvilleGorge]

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Not denying Foles played well.

But Wentz is better, and hasn't even reached his peak yet.

I agree Wentz is better, but with the Eagles' D for most of that game no QB was going to blow the Pats out.

[Davidson Deac II]

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If Wentz had been in that game, the Eagles would have won in a blowout.

Is that sarcasm?  I doubt Wentz could have put many more points on the board.

[ZoneRead]

4 minutes ago, Chairman Wow said:

Cam could not run the Eagle's offense. 

His short accuracy and anticipation are among the worst in the league and his decision making is "questionable" to say the least. 

Cam Newton is the reason the Panther's offense did not "evolve" this season.

I think it was our sorry Oc and lack of Wr but ok it was cam.

Our offense was a gorilfied slot Wr and Cam.

[Snake]

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Unless someone brings a steel chair onto the field WWE style there's never going to be a PI call on a hail mary attempt.

Not to mention Gronk pushed a guy half way up the field to get open. 

[Jangler]

hey what happened to those back to back team interviews after the game?

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, Chris1 said:

They put up 41 points lol, the game was close because the defense couldn't contain the Patriots until the very end of the game it had nothing to do with offense.

As bad as the Patriots defense was playing, Wentz could have scored a touchdown every drive.

I'm not knocking Foles at all. Wentz is just better.

[Snake]

Just now, Jangler said:

hey what happened to those back to back team interviews after the game?

Yeah make Bradys ass sit there. 

[outlaw4]

Let's be honest here. If there was no strip sack, the Patriots was going to win the Super Bowl. The saving grace for the Eagles defense was that in a high stakes shootout game, a play like that is all that's needed to make up for playing awful all night.

[CatTower]

1 minute ago, Snake said:

Not to mention Gronk pushed a guy half way up the field to get open. 

I don't see how that's comparable considering there were 4 defenders around Gronk when the ball was coming to him.  Also, they took out one of the Pats wrs on that play too pretty much neglecting Gronk's shove.

[Mr. Scot]

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I agree Wentz is better, but with the Eagles' D for most of that game no QB was going to blow the Pats out.

The Patriots defense was equally bad.

Wentz is better at sustained drives. Foles was living off the big play. Patriots wouldn't have had as much time on offense.