Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL1000 Rank for all starters on the Panthers


PantherWake

Recommended Posts

They have Colin Jones ranked as the #18 SS in the NFL? What in the hell are they smoking? They're definitely not considering CMC's receiving yardage either. I think Horton is a little low too. He's a solid rotational DE. Star falling victim to them likely just looking at stat sheets. There are definitely not 53 better DTs in the NFL than Star Lotulelei. I don't think Worley sucks quite THAT bad, but yeah, he's not a good CB. LOL @ Russell Shepard's straight up 0.00%. Would anyone disagree? Certainly not me. Not sure what they're thinking with Peppers, there's definitely not 42 better DEs in the NFL. Not even close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They have Colin Jones ranked as the #18 SS in the NFL? What in the hell are they smoking? They're definitely not considering CMC's receiving yardage either. I think Horton is a little low too. He's a solid rotational DE. Star falling victim to them likely just looking at stat sheets. There are definitely not 53 better DTs in the NFL than Star Lotulelei. I don't think Worley sucks quite THAT bad, but yeah, he's not a good CB. LOL @ Russell Shepard's straight up 0.00%. Would anyone disagree? Certainly not me. Not sure what they're thinking with Peppers, there's definitely not 42 better DEs in the NFL. Not even close. 

Yeah and Shaq #8 lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thomas96 said:

God damn I'd have rather we made keeping Norwell a priority before this season than Trai...

well with Williams being really good the right side of line is set for the future and both of them being under age 27 for next season, the right side of our line is set for a good while. 

We just have to figure out the other 3 positions, with Matt Kalil being subpar on a rediculous contract, Norwell probably hitting free agency, and Ryan retiring after 2018.  I think we can plug Moton in at LG , but the Kalil brothers were going to really have to hope they perform well and stay healthy in 2018. After that season Ryan will be gone and we can cut Matt without killing the cap. 

Were going to need a LT and C of the future within the next 2 years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

well with Williams being really good the right side of line is set for the future and both of them being under age 27 for next season, the right side of our line is set for a good while. 

We just have to figure out the other 3 positions, with Matt Kalil being subpar on a rediculous contract, Norwell probably hitting free agency, and Ryan retiring after 2018.  I think we can plug Moton in at LG , but the Kalil brothers were going to really have to hope they perform well and stay healthy in 2018. After that season Ryan will be gone and we can cut Matt without killing the cap. 

Were going to need a LT and C of the future within the next 2 years 

Well forget which guard spot they play, Norwell has been better and more consistent than Trai his entire career here, and he should've been the priority to keep over Trai. 

 

As far as the rest of the line goes I agree for the most part but differ slightly on Moton. I don't see Moton playing guard and I don't think our coaching staff thinks he'll play guard either. I think they're grooming him to be our franchise LT and Kalil was a stop-gap to have in place while Moton develops. I could see Moton starting at LT as soon as this year if he progresses and Matt continues to struggle. Either way after this year I see Matt gone and Moton starting.

C and LG are big needs that I don't think we have on the roster right now. Larsen could be an okay piece at one of those spots but I'd love to add a legitimate top-tier starter at the other if Larsen is starting. Wouldn't be opposed to using a pick on interior OL in the first round if we're damn sure he's going to be a stud like a Zack Martin. Billy Price is intriguing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CarolinaSamurai said:

The fact he's paid barely less than Ginn got at the saints blows my fing mind

He's paid about  30% less than Ginn.  What is sad is he's our highest paid receiver:

Russell Shepard    $3,525,000 
Devin Funchess    $1,756,648 
Curtis Samuel    $1,466,741 
    

Some perspective, Patriots spend out twice as much as we do on WRs and Secondary.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...