Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettleman calls out Panthers draft strategy


panthersphan

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, KaseKlosed said:

This.... Maybe Shula was crying for CMC..... Now CMC is not the total package like he thought he was and Ron fires Shula.... yay...lol What a REACH for a top 8 pick... We missed out on the BEST RB and CB drafting CMC so high lol Great Job Panthers... Let us get it right this year. No more hype players... no more fantasies about "evolution of the game with one player" Come back to Earth....

I wont mention that Cook was still on the board when we made our 2nd pick...wouldn't be prudent at this juncture .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

lol...I learned deflection...historian my arse...you missed it ... no biggie

Not a clue...

I won't bother trying to explain metaphors or illustrations to you. You wouldn't understand that either.

What's funniest though is that you actually think you've latched on to something you can use here. In reality, you have no idea just how stupid this makes you look.

But having talked to you before, I'm not surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I call bullshit.

he jumped up for Funchess. 

There were quarterbacks at our picks that were BPA,..

he had groups of needs and put the bpa in groups of those needs— pick comes up and one of those players in that bubble gets picked,.. not outside the bubble.

groups of bubbles— a player from a higher bubble drops,... is higher than the next bubble so that’s BPA,.. still a player of need.

we did need another DT,.. short may not have resigned, 

we needed Kelvin Benjamin— and Shaw Thompson and scores of others.

damn the torpedoes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not a clue...

I won't bother trying to explain metaphors or illustrations to you. You wouldn't understand that either.

What's funniest though is that you actually think you've latched on to something you can use here. In reality, you have no idea just how stupid this makes you look.

But having talked to you before, I'm not surprised.

you would need to explain to me bad metaphors and illustrations...I know about good ones...just own it, it was a very poor illustration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JARROD said:

I call bullshit.

he jumped up for Funchess. 

There were quarterbacks at our picks that were BPA,..

he had groups of needs and put the bpa in groups of those needs— pick comes up and one of those players in that bubble gets picked,.. not outside the bubble.

groups of bubbles— a player from a higher bubble drops,... is higher than the next bubble so that’s BPA,.. still a player of need.

we did need another DT,.. short may not have resigned, 

we needed Kelvin Benjamin— and Shaw Thompson and scores of others.

damn the torpedoes.

do as i say not as i do...but if he had to choose between Luke and Bell then you would see his genius ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, heel31ok said:

you would need to explain to me bad metaphors and illustrations...I know about good ones...just own it, it was a very poor illustration. 

Saying something that you don't understand is generally considered a good sign for the quality of that statement.

 

You probably won't get that either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Saying something that you don't understand is generally considered a good sign for the quality of that statement.

 

You probably won't get that either.

I am sure it was a quality statement because i am also sure you didn't understand it when you said it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...