we can fix our wr core in freeagency without spending big $$

[WOW!!]

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

None of those receivers even smelled real production. It's like comparing lemons to an orange. 

Oh I forgot that 1 season... OMG .. The DA of Wr..lol

[heel31ok]

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

I admit annoyance of the stupidity in this fan base..

You are definitely the number 1 fan...triggered by a different opinion

[top dawg]

Just now, WOW!! said:

Didn't Answer any of my question..

He wasn't injured..

They wanted him to be a number 1 and then he didn't get snaps???

They won't even try to bring him back..

What is this telling you??

Why should we pay for somebody else's failed project again?? So we can go into next season saying the same poo again..

Rhetorical questions don't need answers.  But you did get an answer.  You just don't agree with it, and that's fine.  

Like I said,  nothing wrong with taking a flyer on a guy where you literally lose virtual peanuts. That's really the long and short of it. 

I want two receivers---even three, and if Pryor is one of or not,  so be it. I'm not going to whine about it. 

[WOW!!]

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I haven't heard anyone say "Stop with Pryor!"

 

And I'm saying don't waste that 3 to 4 million on another project.. Use that money and other money to get a for sure thing..

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Oh I forgot that 1 season... OMG .. The DA of Wr..lol

For a converted WR in virtually his first full year at the position,  that's pretty damned good (whether you acknowledge it or not). 

[WOW!!]

1 minute ago, heel31ok said:

You are definitely the number 1 fan...triggered by a different opinion

No I'm triggered by dumb motherfuging ppl like you who I can't seem to avoid on this site. 

[top dawg]

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

And I'm saying don't waste that 3 to 4 million on another project.. Use that money and other money to get a for sure thing..

He would never see that full amount if he's trash like you say that he is. 

 

[WOW!!]

Just now, top dawg said:

For a converted WR in virtually his first full year at the position,  that's pretty damned good (whether you acknowledge it or not). 

To bad it was 6 years in and now he is 1 year from 30.. 

[WOW!!]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

He would never see that full amount if he's trash like you say that he is. 

 

I don't even want to waste the reps at practice.... Use those on younger players with a future. 

[top dawg]

Just now, WOW!! said:

To bad it was 6 years in and now he is 1 year from 30.. 

You keep mentioning this 30bthing like it's bad.  He's still in his prime,  and in great shape. 

[top dawg]

Just now, WOW!! said:

I don't even want to waste the reps.. Use those on younger players with a future. 

Oh,  the "wasted reps" argument. 

I have never put stock into that. 

[WOW!!]

Just now, top dawg said:

You keep mentioning this 30bthing like it's bad.  He's still in his prime,  and in great shape. 

So is getting a  30 year old player  better than getting a 24 year old player with the same or better upside??

[WOW!!]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Oh,  the "wasted reps" argument. 

I have never put stock into that. 

Cool that's your fuging opinion.. I do..

And I don't want to waste them on 30 year old converted QB'S..

[top dawg]

Just now, WOW!! said:

So is getting a  30 year old player  better than getting a 24 year old player with the same or better upside??

Well,  that's the thing.  You don't know if said player has better upside.  Furthermore,  I ain't Gettleman,  I do believe in windows.  People come,  people go.  Each year is a puzzle unto itself.