Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

we can fix our wr core in freeagency without spending big $$

juliosantos

By juliosantos,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I don't think either of those guys were signed as deep threats.    As a matter of fact I don't think they are all that concerned about having a true number 1.  

Actually their speed was the only reason we signed them Aegon Tardouche..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trill OG Newbie

Trill OG

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I see you Don't read previously posted opinion.. 

So let me reiterate this opinion for you..

1. Wallace is a better player.. Bigger history of success.. Has produced the  numbers I previously stated (in another post in this same thread.. smh) would meet my criteria as a smart move and less of a gamble..

2. Age wasn't the only reason I don't want Pryor.. 1 year of production.. Still trying to learn the position.. Mysterious reason the other teams in need of WR help (who he is already playing on or has played on) aren't racing to keep him.. 

If you read previously post you would know this already...

How can you say you don't want a guy based on 1 year of production IF HE HAS ONLY BEEN PLAYING THE POSITION FOR 2 YEARS?

Like bro, he had 1 great year and 1 bad year. How do you not realize he is far from being a finished product? You basically judged him on this year alone and ignored his year in Cleveland.

If you just don't like Pryor admit it and move on. Otherwise you have no credibility when people say they would sign him for cheap. His stats say he would be low risk high reward signing based on his 2 years of production.

There is no gamble in signing Pyror for 2-4 mil deal. Especially since we will use him in the Ginn role. Washington used him as a #1 WR, which is why the experiment failed from the beginning.

#1 rule of FA know your personnel!

Washington signed him expecting him to be the #1 WR and replace Desean Jackson. Pryor is not that level of WR.

Nobody is calling Pryor a #1 WR, we are looking at him as a guy who could fit a role for this offense as a deep threat in the "Ginn role".

I think your expectations of him as a WR is because you are viewing him as a #1 WR and our big prize of the offseason. In reality he is just a guy who fits a role in the offense.

*I hope you now understand why so many people are agreeing that Pryor would be worth the gamble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Trill OG said:

How can you say you don't want a guy based on 1 year of production IF HE HAS ONLY BEEN PLAYING THE POSITION FOR 2 YEARS?

Like bro, he had 1 great year and 1 bad year. How do you not realize he is far from being a finished product? You basically judged him on this year alone and ignored his year in Cleveland.

If you just don't like Pryor admit it and move on. Otherwise you have no credibility when people say they would sign him for cheap. His stats say he would be low risk high reward signing based on his 2 years of production.

There is no gamble in signing Pyror for 2-4 mil deal. Especially since we will use him in the Ginn role. Washington used him as a #1 WR, which is why the experiment failed from the beginning.

#1 rule of FA know your personnel!

Washington signed him expecting him to be the #1 WR and replace Desean Jackson. Pryor is not that level of WR.

Nobody is calling Pryor a #1 WR, we are looking at him as a guy who could feel a role for this offense as a deep threat in the "Ginn role".

I think your expectations of him as a WR is because you are viewing him as a #1 WR and our big prize of the offseason. In reality he is just a guy who fits a role in the offense.

*I hope you now understand why so many people are agreeing that Pryor would be worth the gamble.

1. DING DING DING DING.. I don't want to sign a player with 1 year of production.. Especially if that player is almost 30... That should be so simple to understand..

2. DING DING DING DING.. 2 .. I want a finish product.. .. If we can't get that I at least want a younger unfinished product with more than 1 year of production.. Simple to understand..

3. I don't like Pryor said it for 5 pages now.. My reason are facts as well and I named better options who are less of a gamble.. And every player you sign is some sort of a gamble..

 

4.it is a gamble you are giving him money and reps that can go to younger and better players..

5. I know our personal and history way better than you..

6. And Deasean Jackson is the exact type of WR most want here?? A deep speed threat right?? And Pryor wasn't that for the Redskins ??hmmmmmm?? Lmao..

7. I'm not even thinking he is a number 2.. 3 or 4 is more what I was thinking.. Which is why I want to sign a better player who can be that..

8. See 7.. I want a player who comes in as a starter not a person you don't know can win a starting job. 

9. I understood before.. Your opinion.. I'm giving you mine.. and I disagree with you.. This is the place we do this at... I hope you understand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Car123 Proficient

Car123

Posted
Posted

We don’t need a true number 1. We need someone who can deliver when called upon. Someone with good speed and separation ability.

We have our possession receivers: Funchess and Olsen

Slot: CMC and Samuel

Deep threats: Byrd and Samuel

Moncrief or Paul Richardson would fill the need. Sorry, but we cannot afford a WR on a 10 million+ a year salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Car123 said:

They were signed to replace Ginn.

No they weren't.  They were signed because we were thin at wr.  Not one single person with the team, including the guy that signed them claimed either were a replacement for Ginn.  That thought came from the huddle faithful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trill OG Newbie

Trill OG

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

1. DING DING DING DING.. I don't want to sign a player with 1 year of production.. Especially if that player is almost 30... That should be so simple to understand..

2. DING DING DING DING.. 2 .. I want a finish product.. .. If we can't get that I at least want a younger unfinished product with more than 1 year of production.. Simple to understand..

3. I don't like Pryor said it for 5 pages now.. My reason are facts as well and I named better options who are less of a gamble.. And every player you sign is some sort of a gamble..

 

4.it is a gamble you are giving him money and reps that can go to younger and better players..

5. I know our personal and history way better than you..

6. And Deasean Jackson is the exact type of WR most want here?? A deep speed threat right?? And Pryor wasn't that for the Redskins ??hmmmmmm?? Lmao..

7. I'm not even thinking he is a number 2.. 3 or 4 is more what I was thinking.. Which is why I want to sign a better player who can be that..

8. See 7.. I want a player who comes in as a starter not a person you don't know can win a starting job. 

9. I understood before.. Your opinion.. I'm giving you mine.. and I disagree with you.. This is the place we do this at... I hope you understand. 

I have no words for this.lol

We will agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Car123 Proficient

Car123

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

No they weren't.  They were signed because we were thin at wr.  Not one single person with the team, including the guy that signed them claimed either were a replacement for Ginn.  That thought came from the huddle faithful.

Well yeah, no one is going to come out and say they were signed to replace Ginn. That’s foolish.

Same way Keyshawn was signed to replace Muhammad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trill OG Newbie

Trill OG

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Car123 said:

We don’t need a true number 1. We need someone who can deliver when called upon. Someone with good speed and separation ability.

We have our possession receivers: Funchess and Olsen

Slot: CMC and Samuel

Deep threats: Byrd and Samuel

Moncrief or Paul Richardson would fill the need. Sorry, but we cannot afford a WR on a 10 million+ a year salary.

This!

It's just a matter of who you prefer at this point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...