Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report of Sean Payton taunting Viking fans confirmed to be true


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

They had a talk with all the DBs lol. Dude panicked.

You got to admit though that it is funny.  I honestly can't stop laughing.  Best laugh I've has since 28-3.   Lord knows we've laid some eggs in the past but I hope we never step on our dick the way you guys did.   Props to spanking our ass 3 times in one season.  That will be our legacy for the season.

 

PS.  I haven't forgotten the broom.  Hopefully our guys see that and use it as motivation to not be a bunch of pussies the next time we meet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Payton doesn't bother me a bit, in fact I can't think of a player or coach that really does bother me. Football is pure entertainment and nothing more. Without "good guys" and "villains" it would be pretty boring. A league with no Jerry Jones, Cam (both), Payton, Kelce, Norman, OBJ etc? No thanks. 

The ones I could do without are guys like Suh and Burfict who have seemed to go to the extreme in order to jeopardize careers a time or two. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Johnny Rockets said:

Payton doesn't bother me a bit, in fact I can't think of a player or coach that really does bother me. Football is pure entertainment and nothing more. Without "good guys" and "villains" it would be pretty boring. A league with no Jerry Jones, Cam (both), Payton, Kelce, Norman, OBJ etc? No thanks. 

The ones I could do without are guys like Suh and Burfict who have seemed to go to the extreme in order to jeopardize careers a time or two. 

If you take issue with players like Suh, and Burfict "jeopardizing careers", how can you simultaneously just casually omit a coaching staff incentivizing and actively encouraging the deliberate attempt to injure other players?

There's some confusion there to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheRed said:

If you take issue with players like Suh, and Burfict "jeopardizing careers", how can you simultaneously just casually omit a coaching staff incentivizing and actively encouraging the deliberate attempt to injure other players?

There's some confusion there to say the least.

Sure, it was a little bit concerning when all that came out. They were punished and it's long in the past though.  I never think about it while watching them play but if people want to bring it up till the end of time so be it. That's fine.

I honestly wasn't outraged by bounty gate though just like I am not outraged by Burfict or Suh. Besides, the Panthers had a bounty thing going at times years ago along with many other teams. Not as widespread as what the Saints had and maybe for a game or two but whatever. Hell, Buddy Ryan and the Eagles has a body bag game!

I guess I should have said "if I was to have any issue with a guy" it would be with someone like Suh or Burfict but honestly I don't. 

Don't  drag me into one of your moral arguments because I have no interest in partaking. Just make a note saying I wasn't outraged by Bounty Gate in that book of morals you keep on everyone, and you can use against me later.  *Cheers*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

Payton doesn't bother me a bit, in fact I can't think of a player or coach that really does bother me. Football is pure entertainment and nothing more. Without "good guys" and "villains" it would be pretty boring. A league with no Jerry Jones, Cam (both), Payton, Kelce, Norman, OBJ etc? No thanks. 

The ones I could do without are guys like Suh and Burfict who have seemed to go to the extreme in order to jeopardize careers a time or two. 

You've heard the phrase "never meet your idols"?

I feel fairly certain that if we actually got to know all the players on our favorite team, we'd find a lot of them to be a--holes that we'd hate if they weren't Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

You got to admit though that it is funny.  I honestly can't stop laughing.  Best laugh I've has since 28-3.   Lord knows we've laid some eggs in the past but I hope we never step on our dick the way you guys did.   Props to spanking our ass 3 times in one season.  That will be our legacy for the season.

 

PS.  I haven't forgotten the broom.  Hopefully our guys see that and use it as motivation to not be a bunch of pussies the next time we meet.

I'm used to epic plays that lose the game for us in the playoffs. Beastquake. 2011 Niners. It is what it is at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

Sure, it was a little bit concerning when all that came out. They were punished and it's long in the past though.  I never think about it while watching them play but if people want to bring it up till the end of time so be it. That's fine.

I honestly wasn't outraged by bounty gate though just like I am not outraged by Burfict or Suh. Besides, the Panthers had a bounty thing going at times years ago along with many other teams. Not as widespread as what the Saints had and maybe for a game or two but whatever. Hell, Buddy Ryan and the Eagles has a body bag game!

I guess I should have said "if I was to have any issue with a guy" it would be with someone like Suh or Burfict but honestly I don't. 

Don't  drag me into one of your moral arguments because I have no interest in partaking. Just make a note saying I wasn't outraged by Bounty Gate in that book of morals you keep on everyone, and you can use against me later.  *Cheers*

Well to be fair, you brought up Suh and Burfict unprompted. All the sudden when someone reminds you of bountygate, you pull a 180 and say none of it actually outrages you at all. I mean if that's the case that's fine. Nobody is attacking you, so the passive aggressive bit at the end is rather unwarranted. *shrug*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Snake said:

Lol so to a Saints fan a TD celebration is taunting. You guys really are snowflakes. 

Cams celebrations are who he is on the field when he advances for a first down or gets a TD. So what if he looks like it is taunting because that is what players do. If anyone wants to go overboard with taunts they show that they are cowards and can't take having some fun on the field and want to fight which makes them a poor sportsman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Snake said:

Lol so to a Saints fan a TD celebration is taunting. You guys really are snowflakes. 

Lol. He Supermanned in his face. That was a blatant taunt. And then guys wonder why Jordan sent him a bottle of wine. 

Snowflake? That title needs to be reserved for the softest internet fanbase in football lol. There is more crying here than any forum I visit. I'm just saying lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...