Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers will hire Norv Turner as OC


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Just now, Cartel de Carolina said:

Maybe the D was keying in on the run leaving deep open? 

Thousand variables to consider. 

Cam can make all the throws. To think otherwise is absurd. 

I never said he couldn’t.

I said that he is better as a medium to long ball thrower.

He doesn’t fit a West Coast offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, JARROD said:

I think you guys are crazy.

WCO is just a language. Football is football.

Coaches run their own iterations of everything anyway. Some feature tightends, some pass catching running backs, some hate tightends. Some like short routes, some like more timing and hard squared off routes, some like rounded. 

You guys are acting like football systems are like rigid old kungfu styles or something.

Cam makes plenty of short and medium throw touchdowns. We’ve seen him do plenty of 3 and 5 step drops this year, so I don’t know what everyone is talking about.

In 2011 Cam threw 450 yards to Stewart and about that to Deangelo Williams, proof.

 

 

Basically this, when people refer to things like WCO or "Air Coryell", what you're really talking about is the terminology used to teach, classify and call plays. You can run any kind of offense with any kind of system. The Patriots use a system that was originally designed for a conservative power run offense, but have adapted it for a no-huddle offense built around quick/short passes. 

With that said, I don't think it makes much sense to change how the entire playbook is written in year 8. What we need to improve is the week by week game planning and our situational play calling during the game. Offensive football isn't all that complicated, when you boil it down to the basics, all you're trying to do is create one on one matchups that your guys can win. That's where I feel Shula was most lacking, his play calls and gameplans often left our guys in positions where it was very difficult to make a play.

If you can stomach a little (ok maybe a lot) of Patriot's ball washing, this article is very informative on the subject,

http://grantland.com/features/how-terminology-erhardt-perkins-system-helped-maintain-dominance-tom-brady-patriots/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beastson said:

WCO

Air Coryell

Option

Idc what offense you're in, but we need someone who can make in-game adjustments. If we see a weakness, we can exploit in the 2nd quarter. We don't need a if it works it works, if it doesn't oh well offense. Can Norv do that?

Yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mjligon said:

That’s great and all but you’re missing the point.

Cam is better suited in an air coryell system 

Your missing the point. 

You have to take what the defense gives you. 

If the D is going to leave the flats and underneath open you take it.

If the D is going to play underneath and take away the short stuff you hit them medium to long. 

If the D is going to stack the box you throw the ball.

If the D is going to leave the box light you try to make them pay with the run. 

If the D is playing the run aggressively you hit them with play action.

If the DBs are playing 10 yards off the WRs you hit them with some quick outs. 

etc etc. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cartel de Carolina said:

Your missing the point. 

You have to take what the defense gives you. 

If the D is going to leave the flats and underneath open you take it.

If the D is going to play underneath and take away the short stuff you hit them medium to long. 

If the D is going to stack the box you throw the ball.

If the D is going to leave the box light you try to make them pay with the run. 

If the D is playing the run aggressively you hit them with play action.

If the DBs are playing 10 yards off the WRs you hit them with some quick outs. 

etc etc. 

 

Breaking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Newton was the fourth most accurate passer in the league on passes that [traveled] further than five yards downfield. His 68.46 percent mark was only beaten out by Andrew Luck, Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees. Newton was second only to Tom Brady in the 11-20 yard range, he was accurate on 70.54 percent of those throws. On 21+ yard throws, Newton ranked eighth with a 49.18 percent accuracy number."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, JARROD said:

I think you guys are crazy.

WCO is just a language. Football is football.

Coaches run their own iterations of everything anyway. Some feature tightends, some pass catching running backs, some hate tightends. Some like short routes, some like more timing and hard squared off routes, some like rounded. 

You guys are acting like football systems are like rigid old kungfu styles or something.

Cam makes plenty of short and medium throw touchdowns. We’ve seen him do plenty of 3 and 5 step drops this year, so I don’t know what everyone is talking about.

In 2011 Cam threw 450 yards to Stewart and about that to Deangelo Williams, proof.

There's not a huge difference between Coryell and E-P other than language, but Coryell and WCO have very different emphasis and require different skill sets and personnel.

To run a Coryell, you primarily want deep threat receivers.  YAC isn't necessarily a big deal.  To run WCO though, you want guys who can take a short pass and make people miss.

Blocking schemes are different too.  WCO generally prefers lighter, more agile OL guys because they do a lot of zone and cut blocking in that approach where Coryell systems tend to prefer the big big uglys.

At quarterback, Coryell QBs don't necessarily need to be mobile, but they do need to be good long passers. WCO QBs don't absolutely have to be mobile but it helps.  As far as passing, guys like Joe Montana and Chad Pennington worked much better in West Coast schemes where the short pass was essentially a long handoff and a big arm wasn't necessary.  Whereas someone like Newton who likes to chuck it downfield suits a Coryell. 

So yeah, it matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've explained this in more detail before. Briefly, there's a process to quickly evaluate a QB. Also, there's a type of QB that excels at a higher rate than others at the pro level. After that, it's about keeping the QBs flowing through the system. 1st round QBs are not superior, they just get more reps and game time. You can find just as many competitive QBs that are 3rd day or undrafted if you give them the same reps and game time. Now, to dive deeper for fun. To understand this further, there are rare 1st round QB exceptions, but they must come with a pro pedigree and proven success in college. There's only 1 to 3 of these QBs every decade (John Elway 1983, Peyton Manning 1998, Eli Manning 2004, Andrew Luck 2012, Jared Goff 2016, Patrick Mahomes 2017, and Joe Burrow 2020. That's 1 of every 20 1st round QBs (5% of historical 1st round QBs in modern draft era). When you look at 1st rd QB success, eliminate these rare ones from your samples because they are trained to be championship QBs. 100% of them have taken their team to a championship. Also, the Bill Walsh tree knows the formula for building an offense and finding a QB QUICKLY. The question is why haven't others figured it out & continue to waste draft capital on QBs? Based on my QB evaluation system, here's the QBs I had slotted for the Panthers over the past 10 drafts. Patrick Mahomes, Brad Kaaya, Cooper Rush, Lamar Jackson, Brett Rypien, Tyler Huntley, Jalen Hurts, Shane Buechele, Desmond Ridder, Brock Purdy, Aqeel Glass, Jack Coan, Aidan O'Connell, Tanner McKee, Spencer Rattler, Devin Leary, Sam Hartman, Quinn Ewers. The ones in bold were the ones that rated the highest for pro championship qualities (probable franchise QBs). Obviously,  we didn't need them all, but it's about flow of pro championship qualities shown in college and not the most physically gifted. Also, there are a few QBs every decade who have the qualities, but never get a chance. If your talent evaluation/QB system is good enough, you can go get 2 to 3 of them tomorrow to show what they can do when their name is called. I expect 1 of every 6 QBs to be worthy of being a franchise QB. There's strict rules to the depth chart qualifications, rotation, minimum KPIs and cuts/trades for me. Panthers have had Collins, Beuerlein, Weinke, Delhomme, Clausen, Newton, Bridgewater, Darnold, and Young. If you include Lewis, Peete, Allen and Mayfield, the Panthers have had 3 of 13 championship level franchise QBs. 1 of 5 (1 of 6 if you don't count Collins). It's the same for every franchise. The difference is a certain coaching tree knows how to move them through quicker than all the others while building defense with the most valuable draft picks. For Walsh, Montana(3rd rd) was his 3rd QB and Young(trade) was his 12th (9 yrs). He had a process allowing him to move through them rapidly. For Holmgren, Favre(trade) was his 4th QB and Hasselbeck(6th rd/trade) was his 15th QB (10 yrs). Neither of them settled on or tried to solve the problems of their 1st QB. For Andy Reid, McNabb(1st rd) was his 2nd QB and Mahomes(1st rd) was his 15th QB (19yrs). For John Harbaugh, Flacco(1st rd) was his 1st and Jackson(1st rd) was his 8th (11 yrs). For Sean McVay, Goff(1st rd) was his 1st and Stafford(trade) was his 5th (5yrs). Reid was the slow and stubborn one who wouldn't move on from his QB & had to wait nearly 2 decades to grab a QB that is the rare exception. I present this to show how 1st round picks are wasted on QBs, and it's the process fitting the QB to the system that generates success. Championship leader qualities and a process to move through QBs for a single coach's offense until you find a winner is the formula. The ages of these QBs from the Walsh tree when they won their first SB: Montana(25), Young(33), Favre(27), Mahomes(24), Flacco(27), and Stafford (33). Mahomes is the only sports pedigree QB exception on this list. QBs selected in the top 20 picks that weren't a pedigree QB were discarded by the team that drafted them. It will continue to be the same for the QB position as the dynamics of an offense from coach to field to team to clutch moments are not going to change. The combines/draft is just a media show that will only highlight the rare pedigree exceptions at QB for the NFL. You can line up ANY 12 QBs demonstrating success in college with the pro championship level qualities right now & you'll find a couple franchise QBs. Overrated arm strength & athleticism mean absolutely nothing for success at the pro level (that's a bonus). If they had enough of the tangibles to consistently succeed in college, it will translate to the pros. Currently, the Panthers are on QB #1 being shoved into Canales' system. Hooker is Canales' 4th QB (5th if you count Bryce Perkins). The Panthers only need to get Young out of the way and start giving these QBs a shot. If a GM can't fit a QB with the offensive coach in 6 QBs, then it's time to move to a new GM. For Canales' system, I'd go with Cooper Rush(trade), Tyler Huntley(available/ps), Desmond Ridder(available), Jack Coan(available), Aqeel Glass(available), Tanner McKee(trade), Sam Hartman(available/ps), Devin Leary(available), Hendon Hooker(on roster), Clayton Tune(available/ps), Chris Oladokun(available/ps), DJ Uiagalelei(available/ps) and Shane Buechele(available/ps). No particular order. This just demonstrates the winning process at QB to build a winning team. 7 of these QBs have been chosen by SB winning coaches. The point is to line them up and have one head coach with one offensive system move through them as quickly as possible until one of them holds on to the starting position with success and claims the franchise QB title. I expect the top 20 1st round picks for a franchise QB is the only way crowd to attack this and the Bill Walsh tree. Likely going to tell you that 6th round & later QBs as well as the Walsh tree are the sole outliers. We can count more 6th round and later championship QBs(13) than we can the 1st round pedigree QBs(7). As for the other 47 SB QBs, only 15 QBs have been drafted in the top 20 and led their first team to the SB. The best return is the pedigree 1st round QB, but this is rare. As for top 20 pick QBs that aren't pedigree, you're better off running 6th round and later QBs through the offensive system as quick as possible while spending that top 20 1st round pick on core defense or the rare dual threat skill position player. I don't expect the typical media driven fan to agree. I know SB winning coaches keep signing my college QB targets.
    • Best QB I've seen this year so far, with all due respect to Allen and Jackson.
    • What’s with the chargers run game?  They were good last year 
×
×
  • Create New...