Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Please stop with the Chudzinski talk


TN05

Recommended Posts

Chudzinski record by year
2007 - 10-6 (8th-ranked offense)
2008 - 4-12 (30th-ranked offense)
2011 - 6-10 (5th-ranked offense)
2012 - 7-9 (18th-ranked offense)
2013 - 4-12 (27th-ranked offense)
2015 - 8-8 (24th-ranked offense)
2016 - 8-8 (8th-ranked offense)
2017 - 4-12 (30th-ranked offense)
Total - 51-77 (avg. 19th-ranked offense)

For comparison, Shula record by year:
2013 - 12-4 (18th-ranked offense)
2014 - 7-8-1 (19th-ranked offense)
2015 - 15-1 (1st-ranked offense)
2016 - 6-10 (15th-ranked offense)
2017 - 11-5 (12th-ranked offense)
Total - 51-28-1 (avg. 13th-ranked offense)

Neither are good but Shula somehow had a better offense almost every year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chud only flourishes with 2 tightends and a running back that can catch. 

Times where he has a top 10 offense he had those things—

when he didn’t it fell apart.

not innovative enough, I would just want him more than a Turner kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dumb

Shula would have the 53rd ranked offense if he coached the Browns. Would be Canadian teams and ping pong teams with better offense than him in that situation.

Don't necessarily want Chud but our defense was dookie and losing us games in his years. Cam had the lead when he left the field a lot early in his career and still took the Ls. Now we have a top 10 defense year in and out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Chud only flourishes with 2 tightends and a running back that can catch. 

Times where he has a top 10 offense he had those things—

when he didn’t it fell apart.

not innovative enough, I would just want him more than a Turner kid.

Well we have one great tight end and a RB that can catch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TN05 said:

Chudzinski record by year
2007 - 10-6 (8th-ranked offense)
2008 - 4-12 (30th-ranked offense)
2011 - 6-10 (5th-ranked offense)
2012 - 7-9 (18th-ranked offense)
2013 - 4-12 (27th-ranked offense)
2015 - 8-8 (24th-ranked offense)
2016 - 8-8 (8th-ranked offense)
2017 - 4-12 (30th-ranked offense)
Total - 51-77 (avg. 19th-ranked offense)

For comparison, Shula record by year:
2013 - 12-4 (18th-ranked offense)
2014 - 7-8-1 (19th-ranked offense)
2015 - 15-1 (1st-ranked offense)
2016 - 6-10 (15th-ranked offense)
2017 - 11-5 (12th-ranked offense)
Total - 51-28-1 (avg. 13th-ranked offense)

Neither are good but Shula somehow had a better offense almost every year

Maybe because Cam is better than any other QB he ever coached?  Coincidentally, the year he coached Cam was his best ranked offense.  After that he was stuck with cleveland and then a colts team where Luck hardly ever took the field, and when he did had no offensive line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRed said:

No more retreads. No more archaic football approaches from a decade ago. Bring in fresh ideas.

Ultimately this but the conversation is still pertinent, therefore, nope don't stop it's offseason and a football forum.

Have to agree here though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, uncfan888 said:

Well we have one great tight end and a RB that can catch

I agree. If we commit to getting a Shockey in here or another tightend that makes Olsen the Shockey this time, then Chud would flourish.

if we don’t he would suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...