Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We're picking 24th in the 1st round


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Christian MF Kirk

Quick, fast, bulk enough for a short speed guy to play outside.

A TRUE WR who knows route running and wont have to learn unlike this years 2nd round pick

Good Hands, Fast hands/reaction

 

WR, Safety, CB, TE, OL, DE, in that order

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Thanatos said:

How is the answer anything other than WR?

Personally I'd prefer a veteran given this FA class. But hell, I wouldn't complain about signing a legit vet AND dfrsfting one at #24.

I'd be fine with any of the following at #24:

DE, S, CB, WR, TE.

Twist my arm and I'd pick DE. Our DEs are ancient and our defensive philosophy has always been to put our eggs in the basket of having a dominant front seven to make life easowr for our secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Lol I watch Locked On Hornets every now and then. Those guys don't know basketball. They were screaming take Scoot over Miller and we see how that turned out.     I just watch them for the laughs at this point.
    • Remember folks anointing Bryce after the Texans game last year?  I do. Whew boy, that aged about as well as milk in the Sahara.   Undoubtedly he's playing better, but I have yet to see the level of play to say I want him as our franchise QB going forward for the next 10 years.
    • Just because we made a bad trade and selected the wrong QB does not mean we should double triple and quadruple down on a QB who is currently for this season 35th in passing yards 36th in touchdowns 39th in yards per attempt 40th in yards per game 39th in completion % and 42nd in passer rating. In this league you need not only a really good QB but it pays dividends to have a good backup plan in place. Why would you or anyone else be against us having a real legitimate insurance policy this go around instead of a washed up Andy Dalton and an afterthought like Jack Plummer? It sounds to me like some of you are only invested in catering to one player because you want to salvage the trade instead of doing what is best for the whole team long term. Bryce Young does not carry that level of sway. That's all there is to it.
×
×
  • Create New...