Grounding?

[ForJimmy]

Does anyone have an image of him outside the tackle box. I couldn’t tell live...

[beastson]

1 minute ago, Doc Holiday said:

The INT didn’t cost us anything

It cost us 15 yards. A stop on 50 probably alone would have won it

[Double Trouble]

Just now, Doc Holiday said:

The INT didn’t cost us anything

16 yards of field position when you have no timeouts and under two minutes isn't anything? We could have been inside the 10 and these slow developing plays wouldn't have been called.

[luke262]

Had Adams been the receiver the 'catch' would have 100% been reviewed 

[Double Trouble]

Just now, beastson said:

It cost us 15 yards. A stop on 50 probably alone would have won it

exactly we would have been inside the 10 yard line. and that grounding play probably doesn't occur because we'd call quicker developing plays.

[ThPantherFan]

5 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Clearly outside the tackle box. Clearly past the line of scrimmage.

This was literally the most lopsided officiating game I’ve ever seen.

Wasn't Bersin coming back toward the throw?  That would negate intentional grounding if a player was coming back toward the ball.

[Harbingers]

Yo people. You want to talk about INT or play go to another thread. This is about the blatant abuse of the ref power. Drew Bree’s had closer grounding calls then that... which weren’t called. Them Shaun Payton’s time guy runs on the field because it “should” have been a run off. He wasn’t even in a teal fuging jacket. This some bullshit and JR better suck up his bride and take one for the team he built. And spill all the beans.

[Double Trouble]

1 minute ago, ThPantherFan said:

Wasn't Bersin coming back toward the throw?  That would negate intentional grounding if a player was coming back toward the ball.

it was debatable if we was in the area. Bersin did a terrible job finishing that play, he should have been sprinting toward that ball even after the ball ended. He just sorta walked back to the huddle oblivious to what was going on.

[The Lobo]

8 minutes ago, bull123 said:

Was it?....and why no review on the int?....that also looked like pass int on the pass to finch over the middle

The int should have been reviewed he did not complete the catch.

[Snake]

It was grounding. Sorry but it was. 

[GoobyPls]

It wasn’t fuking grounding 

And Adams didn’t catch that

[Harbingers]

1 minute ago, Snake said:

It was grounding. Sorry but it was. 

No it wasn’t it clearly passed the line of scrimmage.

[Thanatos]

They were saying he was inside the tackle box, it sure didn't look like that to me.

[Thanatos]

4 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

No it wasn’t it clearly passed the line of scrimmage.

It can be past the line of scrimmage and still be grounding if he's inside the tackle box. Please learn the rules.