Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton the Fastest NFL QB, Says NYTimes


Greatman77

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Greatman77 said:

The article is confusing on this point, but what they say is that Cam reached that speed running with the ball and Wilson was chasing down the man who intercepted his pass so technically, he was not playing offense when he reached top speed...

Also when you're not running with a ball in your hands, you're running in a more natural motion (i.e. both arms fully swinging and providing momentum).  Runners running *with* the ball will be naturally inhibited just a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thomas96 said:

But Wilson is still a QB no matter what he's doing on the field, that's his position. It doesn't say fastest player on offense, it says fastest QB.

If Cam running with the ball in his hand/arm is just a microsecond slower than Wilson running full out without a ball in his hand/arm, I'm willing to bet Cam is faster than Wilson in a clean race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mikey815 said:

Fournette was likely timed at top end speed during his 90 yard run when was never touched. I guarantee there are several players who would beat fournette in a race Like number 10 of the Chiefs

There's a huge size difference there as well, however. Hill would win a race because he starts faster, but wide open, I've said for a long time that Fournette is as fast as any player I've watched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

If Cam running with the ball in his hand/arm is just a microsecond slower than Wilson running full out without a ball in his hand/arm, I'm willing to bet Cam is faster than Wilson in a clean race.

could be. i'm not sure how much of a difference that would be, but it very well could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

There's a huge size difference there as well, however. Hill would win a race because he starts faster, but wide open, I've said for a long time that Fournette is as fast as any player I've watched.

any of those track guys like marquise goodwin would smoke Fournette in any speed aspect, even top speed at some point during a long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...