Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton the Fastest NFL QB, Says NYTimes


Greatman77

Recommended Posts

According to this article on the New York Times website, Cam Newton clocked the fastest in-game, on-field speed for QB's in the NFL this season at 20.08 mph. The fastest on-field speed for all NFL offensive players was recorded by Leonard Fournette at 22.05 mph. Defensive back Byron Jones was fastest at any position at 22.11mph. The article is behind a pay wall: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/sports/football/nfl-speed-leonard-fournette.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=wide-thumb&module=mini-moth&region=top-stories-below&WT.nav=top-stories-below&_r=0

Fair use excerpt:

"Seattle Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson’s top speed of 20.14 m.p.h. is slightly faster than Cam Newton’s 20.08. But in a twist, Wilson reached that speed playing some defense — chasing down Rams safety John Johnson III after an interception to save a touchdown. After the game, Wilson said the tackle “took me back to my high school days when I used to play corner.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

So Wilson is the actual fastest...?

The article is confusing on this point, but what they say is that Cam reached that speed running with the ball and Wilson was chasing down the man who intercepted his pass so technically, he was not playing offense when he reached top speed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mikey815 said:

Those mph times are higher if the player is on a long run of at least 60 yards. It takes a runner 60 yards to reach top speed

Excellent point and the article states that these speeds were recorded using chips in the players shoulder pads during long runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Greatman77 said:

The article is confusing on this point, but what they say is that Cam reached that speed running with the ball and Wilson was chasing down the man who intercepted his pass so technically, he was not playing offense when he reached top speed...

But Wilson is still a QB no matter what he's doing on the field, that's his position. It doesn't say fastest player on offense, it says fastest QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, uncfan888 said:

Going to be? We're in the process of that

I think he could play for several more years but it depends on if we can actually field a consistent OL/WR combo which we have yet to be able to do astoundingly enough.

People are rationalizing our FO's failures right now, but eventually they are going to wonder what if. Especially pertaining to the 2016 and 2017 offseasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nosuchthingasapanther said:

people refuse to see it, but he's on the tail end of his prime.

Yeah I suppose that's why he singlehandedly dragged our offense to 11 wins and a playoff berth.

Who really knows when the lights will shut off.

All I know is this franchise could have and should have done more. We should have been all in the last 2 years, instead we kept trying to bargain shop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...