Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

January 2017 Transfer Season


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Goondal said:

How much longer Are they keeping Navas you think?

Depends on what they do in the summer. The annual Courtois/De Gea rumors are popping up again, and it definitely sounds like Kepa is viewed as more of a long term project. I would love for RM to just activate Oblak's release clause, because I think he's the best GK in the world. But since that seems unlikely, I wouldn't be shocked to see Madrid splash some cash for Courtois, and ship Navas to maybe Liverpool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shocking development here....Schlake’s Leon Goretzka will sign a pre-contract with wait for it..................................

 

Bayern Munich. I know, we’ve never seen Bayern poach the best player of another Bundesliga club for free (or next to nothing). Seriously though....great get for Bayern. He’s a special talent that will pair nicely with Toliso in the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, C47 said:

I would take 25m and Mkhitaryan and run with it. That's decent value for a player who can sign a Free right now. 

I think Arsenal wants cash.  They are meeting Malcom and Pavón representatives.  Walcott is about to move to Everton as well so Arsenal needs 2 new wingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ARSEN said:

United is hijacking Alexis move to City.  City offered £20M but United offered £25M plus Mahitaryan.

 

4 hours ago, C47 said:

I would take 25m and Mkhitaryan and run with it. That's decent value for a player who can sign a Free right now. 

you're forgetting that Sanchez will just say no. If he's going to Utd he might as well just stay at Arsenal, it's not a step up. he wants to win trophies. he already turned down PSG and Bayern because he wants to play for Pep. he will go to City or he'll wait out his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rodeo said:

 

you're forgetting that Sanchez will just say no. If he's going to Utd he might as well just stay at Arsenal, it's not a step up. he wants to win trophies. he already turned down PSG and Bayern because he wants to play for Pep. he will go to City or he'll wait out his contract.

Sanchez representatives actually been in constant communication MU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ARSEN said:

Sanchez representatives actually been in constant communication MU.

i know. a City source i trust wholeheartedly leaked this days ago, saying Utd were getting ready to try to hijack and are legitimately interested in Sanchez.

today he just said that Sanchez has already rejected them. he says that soon Utd will distance themselves from it to save face, and Sanchez will sign with City soon after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rodeo said:

i know. a City source i trust wholeheartedly leaked this days ago, saying Utd were getting ready to try to hijack and are legitimately interested in Sanchez.

today he just said that Sanchez has already rejected them. he says that soon Utd will distance themselves from it to save face, and Sanchez will sign with City soon after.

BBC reports:

-Alexis will move to City for £25M with £5M in add-one.  

-Malcom to Arsenal is virtually done

-Walcott to Everton for £20M is almost done.

-Cocqulin sold to Valencia for £12M

-Arsenal still negotiating with Pavon.  Initial stage.

-Monaco said Lemar is for sale.  Arsenal said they won’t pay more than £50M (They bid £92M 3 months ago).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...