Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams plan on resting players week 17


Saca312

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Playing a 11 or 12 win team versus playing a 9 or 10 win team... Hmm... Tough decision. 

If they beat us and the Saints win, they'd have to play the Eagles who just scraped by the last three weeks, one of those weeks was against them before Wentz.

However if they're the third seed and best the Falcons, they'd have to play the Vikings, who held them to their lowest point total this season.

It's fair to chase the better divisional round matchup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rags said:

If they beat us and the Saints win, they'd have to play the Eagles who just scraped by the last three weeks, one of those weeks was against them before Wentz.

However if they're the bird seed and best the Falcons, they'd have to play the Vikings, who held them to their lowest point total this season.

It's fair to chase the better divisional round matchup.

Overlooking the wild card round is the exact type of mistake a sh*t franchise like the Rams would make. And let's say they do get to the Eagles and beat them (no given as Foles already beat them once)... Then the 3 seed (Aints or us) beats the Vikings... Rams going on the road for the Championship game. It's completely retarded to rest your starters in a game that affects your playoff seeding. I understand the possible positives, but they are far outweighed by the negatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Overlooking the wild card round is the exact type of mistake a sh*t franchise like the Rams would make. And let's say they do get to the Eagles and beat them (no given as Foles already beat them once)... Then the 3 seed (Aints or us) beats the Vikings... Rams going on the road for the Championship game. It's completely retarded to rest your starters in a game that affects your playoff seeding. I understand the possible positives, but they are far outweighed by the negatives.

I don't think they're overlooking, so much as they want to avoid the Vikings as much as possible and they're just gonna take their chances with everyone else.

They win as the third seed it's a guaranteed matchup against the Vikings.  

I do think the Rams are probably cocky tho and probably won't make it past the wild card no matter who they play, even the Falcons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Rags said:

I do think the Rams are probably cocky tho and probably won't make it past the wild card no matter who they play, even the Falcons.

i do think eventually the ones who have the qb with experience will win out. goff imo is a product of a fantastic system, not the other way around. a qb who knows what he's doing will outlast one who doesn't, especially when the qb has to go against top tier defenses.

goff would likely not be able to handle luke kuechly or the vikings. doubt they'd last long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

i do think eventually the ones who have the qb with experience will win out. goff imo is a product of a fantastic system, not the other way around. a qb who knows what he's doing will outlast one who doesn't, especially when the qb has to go against top tier defenses.

goff would likely not be able to handle luke kuechly or the vikings. doubt they'd last long.

Agree. I do think Goff is improving, but McVays system and Gurley have been why his turnaround has been so lightning quick.

He's been exposed a few times this season.

That said I am concerned against him going against our secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if the Rams are resting starters, that's almost a guarantee loss for them.  Saints and Vikings aren't losing, so what's the incentive for our starters to play?  Win or lose, we're the 5th seed regardless.  And personally, if I was the Rams, I would rather play the Panthers.  Secondary is getting more and more exposed every week, another receiver down, historically, east coast teams tend to struggle on the west coast, etc.  McVay knows what he's doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...