If Saints Are Blowing Out TB By Half-Time, Should We Pull Our Starters For The 2nd Half?

[Palmetto]

2 minutes ago, JARROD said:

I don’t know how anyone would rather us play the Rams than the Saints.

pull back 5-6 really I’ll-timed and costly errors in each game and we were in them, I don’t care what the score said.

the Rams totally annihilated the Seahawks,.. made them look like a high school team,...

If the Panther play mistake free we can beat the Saints,.. and burn down their dome.

the Rams we have not played and again, after they’ve gone on rampages against some really good teams,... I don’t want to play them unless we have to in the NFCCS

Rams dominated the Saints also even if the score didn't look like it

[JARROD]

Just now, Palmetto said:

Rams dominated the Saints also even if the score didn't look like it

Oh,... that too.

again all these people are cheering to play the Rams,...

if we do that will be our Super Bowl,,, win and hopefully we have something left for the rest of the playoffs.

[Riverboat Ron]

But Winston is hungry for those W's!

[mc52beast]

Pretty sure the team will be focused on beating the Falcons and not worrying about the Aints game... 

[Palmetto]

2 hours ago, pantherj said:

Rams racked up wins against poop teams. Vikings are very limited and right in our wheelhouse. Here is the order of strength imo:

1.) Saints

2.) Rams

3.) Vikings

 

Rams beat the # 1 team on your list

[pantherj]

8 minutes ago, Palmetto said:

Rams beat the # 1 team on your list

Yes people keep telling me this. I saw the game. I still think the Saints are the better team.

[SOJA]

we need a game to get right, plus fug atlanta. 

[SOJA]

Vikings, Saints and Rams are all good teams. I truly hope our road to the Superbowl wouldn't included playing all three of those teams but if so, so be it. 

[saints4lifeagain]

3 hours ago, thomas96 said:

Both Rams and Vikings beat them very very handily.

This isn't the same team that played the Vikings.

The Rams won by 6 against one of the most depleted Saints teams of the year. We had just lost Okafor and were playing without both of our corners and lost Okafors replacement in game. 

[Saca312]

believe it or not, i actually find it refreshing @saints4lifeagain is here all confident and sure of his team this year. 

i mean it was just week 3 he came in all dejected and assured they were going to suck all year. for most of the time lately, all he's been able to do lately was talk of the misery the saints were.

now he's as confident and sure as the rest of them. while i still hate the saints and the majority of their fanbase, this man is someone who deserves a chance to brag and talk smack.

fug the saints.

[saints4lifeagain]

1 minute ago, Saca312 said:

believe it or not, i actually find it refreshing @saints4lifeagain is here all confident and sure of his team this year. 

i mean it was just week 3 he came in all dejected and assured they were going to suck all year. for most of the time lately, all he's been able to do lately was talk of the misery the saints were.

now he's as confident and sure as the rest of them. while i still hate the saints and the majority of their fanbase, this man is someone who deserves a chance to brag and talk smack.

fug the saints.

Eh. I'm a realist man. When they came in and looked the way they did the first 2 weeks after 3 straight losing seasons, how else am I supposed to feel. If I say anything other than the truth, I'm a homer. That's just not me. Through 2 weeks of the season, the Saints sucked. The last 13 weeks have been different. 

I've been here steadily through it all. If we suck, I say it. But I'm really not trying to talk smack. Just talk football. I know guys don't get to watch every game, so I'm just here to give knowledgable Saints info, and talk football in general. Think I've been around long enough for people to know that I'm not just blowing poo out of my ass lol. 

[MVPccaffrey]

Saints peaked somewhere in November, but it's possible the Rams peaked against Seattle.  Vikings have actually gotten better.  I would go with:

1. Vikings
2. Saints
3. Rams

 

They're not winning two road games so their path to a SB would necessitate a WC upset along the way.

[Palmetto]

18 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

This isn't the same team that played the Vikings.

The Rams won by 6 against one of the most depleted Saints teams of the year. We had just lost Okafor and were playing without both of our corners and lost Okafors replacement in game. 

So the Saints only real lost was to the Pats (youre going to say they only lost to the falcons because Kamara was out)

Man those ones that dont count stopped them from getting the 2 seed

[Lumps]

32 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

believe it or not, i actually find it refreshing @saints4lifeagain is here all confident and sure of his team this year. 

i mean it was just week 3 he came in all dejected and assured they were going to suck all year. for most of the time lately, all he's been able to do lately was talk of the misery the saints were.

now he's as confident and sure as the rest of them. while i still hate the saints and the majority of their fanbase, this man is someone who deserves a chance to brag and talk smack.

fug the saints.

Sounds to me like he belongs here on the huddle.