Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Would Have Been A Great Offensive Unit For Us This Year.


TheCableGuy

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Are you even a panthers fan?

 

Almost every single one of your post is about Mccaffrey. Are you related to him or something?

I was a Stanford alum and yes I’m a fan of his and know he can be a difference maker if we give him more touches I’m also a panther and a Cam fan and want the team to go all the way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mikey815 said:

I was a Stanford alum and yes I’m a fan of his and know he can be a difference maker if we give him more touches I’m also a panther and a Cam fan and want the team to go all the way

Did you forget the first month of our season when we were force feeding him?

 

He will never be a primary back, take off your Stanford homer glasses. He can still help us win but not like you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCableGuy said:

Fine you disagree about Cmc fine but I also would had kept Ginn which was our best WR and best deep threat we had and also  Curtis could do the samething CMC does they basially the same player. 

We absolutely should have kept Ginn. And no Curtis can’t do the same things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Did you forget the first month of our season when we were force feeding him?

 

He will never be a primary back, take off your Stanford homer glasses. He can still help us win but not like you think.

We agree to disagree Why can’t he be the leD back like Faulk, barber, mccoy, Martin and other all purpose guys his size? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mikey815 said:

We agree to disagree Why can’t he be the leD back like Faulk, barber, mccoy, Martin and other all purpose guys his size? 

Cause those guys run with more balance and don’t get knocked by arm tackles. Also Faulk, McCoy and Barber are faster

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Cause those guys run with more balance and don’t get knocked by arm tackles. Also Faulk, McCoy and Barber are faster

 

Well he’s a rookie It took 4 years before tiki barber was given the touches Let’s just see what happens if and when they start giving him 20 touches. Even at his 3.8 ypc he would likely end up with 1000 rushing yds and over 80 catches I think his ypc would go up with more carries as he gets into a rythm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mikey815 said:

Well he’s a rookie It took 4 years before tiki barber was given the touches Let’s just see what happens if and when they start giving him 20 touches. Even at his 3.8 ypc he would likely end up with 1000 rushing yds and over 80 catches I think his ypc would go up with more carries as he gets into a rythm

Barber wasn’t a top 10 pick, and Barber didn’t get nearly the amount of touches as Mccaffrey.

 

Nobody wants a 3.8 ypc runner getting 1000 yard, that’s called force feeding 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

Barber wasn’t a top 10 pick, and Barber didn’t get nearly the amount of touches as Mccaffrey.

 

Nobody wants a 3.8 ypc runner getting 1000 yard, that’s called force feeding 

We will never agree it’s ok let’s just root for victory in the playoffs happy holidays

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCableGuy said:

Why? Ginn was our #1 WR 2 years ago and we went 15-1 and made it to the superbowl and Cam also had his best season with Ginn as his #1.

Cam also wouldve had like 40 Tds if Ginn couldve catch.  but the team needed him in 2015

he left because the panthers didn't give him the money he wanted

I dont have a problem with that on the Panthers or Ginns side

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...