Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it time for BoA to be demolished/rebuilt?


PanthersATL

Recommended Posts

Saw this on ESPN in an article about the team sale - http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21815010/nfl-why-carolina-panthers-sale-good-news-nfl-business .

Quote

Forbes says the Panthers are now worth $2.3 billion and while there are many factors at play, consider this: The Panthers' lease on their stadium in Charlotte, North Carolina, expires in two seasons. There have been no talks that the franchise could move, but it could lead to a new owner paying more if the city will help build a new facility.

 

While BoA is not a "fancy" as other new stadiums out there -- do we really want to build something new? Where would it go?

Is BoA really that far behind the times with regard to other money-making aspects of field-level club seats, etc? Do we need that poo?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Saw this on ESPN in an article about the team sale - http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21815010/nfl-why-carolina-panthers-sale-good-news-nfl-business .

 

While BoA is not a "fancy" as other new stadiums out there -- do we really want to build something new? Where would it go?

Is BoA really that far behind the times with regard to other money-making aspects of field-level club seats, etc? Do we need that poo?

 

If it could be done financially, I say yes. Personally, I'd like for the team to be moved to Durham or Raleigh....but i'm biased. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell fu(king NO!!!!!  The Saints are not only in a city battered to hell, but play in a cavernous, decrepit dump 3 decades older.  The Packers, Bears, Chiefs, Bills, Jaguars, and Dolphins all play in older if not much older stadiums.  The league is in decline and most people would be absolutely LIVID if those words come out of anyone’s that mouth that matters before 2030, at the expense of taxpayers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt there's a chance the stadium gets demolished.  They "city" has put $75 million or so into recent upgrades and tethered the team for a few more years.  

I just don't see a situation where the Panthers move.  Sure, an owner could want to to move, but there would have to be a very strong case that the league would have to approve.  The Panthers have been very profitable and a good league citizen.  Why move the team?  I'd love it if the board would just get off of it.  When it comes down to it, the city will cave.  The Panthers are too much of a draw and an asset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Saw this on ESPN in an article about the team sale - http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21815010/nfl-why-carolina-panthers-sale-good-news-nfl-business .

 

While BoA is not a "fancy" as other new stadiums out there -- do we really want to build something new? Where would it go?

Is BoA really that far behind the times with regard to other money-making aspects of field-level club seats, etc? Do we need that poo?

 

I say NO need to rebuild a stadium.  While some might say the stadium is old in time frame, it was build with what many of the reasons owners want a new stadium and that is there are a plenty of suites and a lot of club seats.  The club seats also have a very nice area for concessions, etc.  There is also plenty of space still inside for someone to do things, add amenities, etc  I also think the outside is very nice, cool, etc, etc.  I do go to plenty of stadiums throughout the country and while Panthers Stadium is not a mega billion place like Dallas, Atlanta, or Min... it compares very nicely to many and most of the stadiums of other teams.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...