Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

London 2018?


SuperBowlBound

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, dldove77 said:

No reason they can't play a Super Bowl in London one day. I'm shocked London hasn't started bidding on it. 

Maybe UEFA can host UCL final outside Europe? Nahhhhh 

They want regular season Football, but they R smart enough to preserve their regular season soccer games!

We need to stop with that! Use pre season, as they do! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, panthersphan said:

Well, looks like the Panthers will absolutely be there in 2019.

I'll make that trip for sure.

 

funny how much of an afterthought we are in the NFL, 29/30 teams will have played in London.

Meh I think it’s us and Green Bay left and Green Bay is NFL royalty. The sale probably has a lot to do with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, dldove77 said:

No reason they can't play a Super Bowl in London one day. I'm shocked London hasn't started bidding on it. 

There are like 9 reasons why, that you actually have to host an NFL team in your city year round being at the top of the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

whew

 

 

We are exactly the kind of team the NFL would have no qualms stealing a home game from

I can definitely agree with that.

I think there'll be too much uproar if the Wembley hosted a SB, but look at the NFL's visibility at the design and build stages of Spurs' new stadium. You wouldn't put in extra NFL locker rooms and even turf for one or two International Series games. I'm confident a franchise will move there, and was assuming it would be Jaguars until they balled out this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Growl said:

There are like 9 reasons why, that you actually have to host an NFL team in your city year round being at the top of the list.

This is a hard and fast rule? I seriously doubt this would stop them if they want it to happen. 

 

31 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Because a London SB would end up 5 hours off. Inconvenient for advertisers, beer drinkers.

This doesn't stop them from having 9am EST games in London, which start at 6am PST on the west coast. A 9pm GMT kickoff starts at 4pm EST and 1pm PST. Surely if they can risk a snowy Super Bowl in NYC, they can deal with those start times for one year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Players don't take team friendly deals to stay in dumpster fire organizations. At 31 this will be his last shot to get one last payday and possibly his last shot to try to compete for a ring of that's what he wants. He generally fits the description of a guy who would demand a trade more than he fits the description of a guy open to take a team friendly deal with his current team.
    • My point was simply, we do not know the extent of his knees.  If they are shot, as Joe Person referenced after the season (referring to the reason he missed week 17) I am not seeing that as an asset or selling low--it is complicated, I know.  But if you consider what we actually know, you are absolutely right.
    • I just love getting under everyones feathers. Also, if we aren't going to extend him, and I dont see a reason too, why would we be prolonging the inevitable. If we pick at #8, the chances of this guy being BPA is very high. Nobody can agree on who should be picked at #8, we have made that obvious from the 47000 different posts about what we do with the 8th pick. I am just here to give my opinion, which I think makes sense. We act like Moton can't be replaced. This is different than trading Moore, or McCaffrey, they were young. This guy is coming off a knee injury at 31 years of age. and I'm just suggesting we draft a guy who can come in and start at RT, and could possibly switch with Ekwonu in year 2. Or who knows, the guy can probably play LT this year and we can go ahead and make Ekwonu move to RT. Instead of picking BPA I guess we all are good just picking Walker or Mykel ot Mcmillan, or a Safety at #8?  I'm not... If we can't trade back, which I think is the best option unless somehow Carter, Hunter, or Graham are available, then why would I not consider the most athletic OT in the draft instead of reaching? The people on this board are so divided on who to pick, and the minute someone comes up with a hypothetical, they spill their coffee. I LOVE IT!. 
×
×
  • Create New...