Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

London 2018?

SuperBowlBound

By SuperBowlBound,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SuperKat Newbie

SuperKat

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

They're two of the five teams (pretty sure it's 5) that haven't gone. But yes, this was my prediction before the season. Could certainly changed based on their 2017 performances. But I'm gonna ride it out ;) 

Carolina Panthers,  Green Bay Packers, Philadelphia Eagles, Seattle Seahawks, Tennessee Titans and Houston Texans have not played in London.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Delhommey Newbie

Delhommey

Posted
Posted
Just now, dldove77 said:

I really don't even see a good reason why they shouldn't have a Super Bowl in London. Most fans of the teams don't go anyway. What's the difference to the average viewer, other than that it'd have to be a little earlier kickoff than usual?

The amount of bitching Peter King would do to the NFL about the chilly weather and lack of Starbucks is probably a factor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Let's trade Moton

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Players don't take team friendly deals to stay in dumpster fire organizations. At 31 this will be his last shot to get one last payday and possibly his last shot to try to compete for a ring of that's what he wants. He generally fits the description of a guy who would demand a trade more than he fits the description of a guy open to take a team friendly deal with his current team.
    • MHS831
      Let's trade Moton

      By MHS831 · Posted

      My point was simply, we do not know the extent of his knees.  If they are shot, as Joe Person referenced after the season (referring to the reason he missed week 17) I am not seeing that as an asset or selling low--it is complicated, I know.  But if you consider what we actually know, you are absolutely right.
    • scratched
      Let's trade Moton

      By scratched · Posted

      I just love getting under everyones feathers. Also, if we aren't going to extend him, and I dont see a reason too, why would we be prolonging the inevitable. If we pick at #8, the chances of this guy being BPA is very high. Nobody can agree on who should be picked at #8, we have made that obvious from the 47000 different posts about what we do with the 8th pick. I am just here to give my opinion, which I think makes sense. We act like Moton can't be replaced. This is different than trading Moore, or McCaffrey, they were young. This guy is coming off a knee injury at 31 years of age. and I'm just suggesting we draft a guy who can come in and start at RT, and could possibly switch with Ekwonu in year 2. Or who knows, the guy can probably play LT this year and we can go ahead and make Ekwonu move to RT. Instead of picking BPA I guess we all are good just picking Walker or Mykel ot Mcmillan, or a Safety at #8?  I'm not... If we can't trade back, which I think is the best option unless somehow Carter, Hunter, or Graham are available, then why would I not consider the most athletic OT in the draft instead of reaching? The people on this board are so divided on who to pick, and the minute someone comes up with a hypothetical, they spill their coffee. I LOVE IT!. 
×
×
  • Create New...