Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More Details - Jerry Richardson Investigated For BOTH Racial and Sexual Misconduct.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Just now, ickmule said:

Kinda makes you wonder if Gettleman let the cat out of the bag as payback for being let go. 

Someone else said that too. Just doesn't seem likely to me.

What's clear is that a lot of people seem to be aware of the situation, so figuring out who clued in SI could be difficult.

It's worth mentioning that former Panthers beat writer Jonathan Jones is now working for Sports Illustrated, but Jones is not named as being directly associated with the article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toolbox said:

Doubt it.. he is likely going to land a job as GM up in NY and the last thing he needs is to be a part of this drama.

He may have been here during some of the alledged happenings so he would be a part of any investigation anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Does he deserve it?

If he's guilty (and it looks pretty bad) I don't honestly care if his hush money didn't "hush" someone.

SI analyst also pointed out that with multiple agreements out there, it becomes harder to tell who might have leaked something.

Based on the story though, it doesn't sound like they needed to hear from the payoff recipients. Seems like plenty of other people knew what was happening.

I understand all that. But the whole point of an NDA is for hush money. You can’t swallow your pride and agree to shut up in exchange for cash and then talk. That’s bullshit. Either call someone out who has wronged you and stay poor or get rich and keep your fuging mouth shut. Can’t have both. And I have no idea what happened in this case, simply speaking in general. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Montsta said:

I understand all that. But the whole point of an NDA is for hush money. You can’t swallow your pride and agree to shut up in exchange for cash and then talk. That’s bullshit. Either call someone out who has wronged you and stay poor or get rich and keep your fuging mouth shut. Can’t have both. And I have no idea what happened in this case, simply speaking in general. 

I get that, but it says something when you need four of them. And who knows? There may be others that we haven't heard about yet.

If you've already done something bad enough to warrant the need for a non-disclosure agreement, and then you keep engaging in the same behavior, you're either not very smart or perhaps just not a good person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get that, but it says something when you need four of them. And who knows? There may be others that we haven't heard about yet.

If you've already done something bad enough to warrant the need for a non-disclosure agreement, and then you keep engaging in the same behavior, you're either not very smart or perhaps just not a good person.

Agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...