Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: Daryl Williams second-best tackle in the league


TN05

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Agreed and not every rookie is a stud right away. You can’t evaluate a GM for 4 drafts in 4 years. Oh well, still glad to have these guys. 

Exactly. Last year the 2015 draft looked bad but now it's pretty damn clear that Funch, Williams and Mayo were all definite great picks. Shaq is still up in the air. He's solid, not looking like worthy of a 1st rounder, but there's still time if he can have a more clearly defined role in the D. And CAP ain't no slouch either, for where he was picked. I don't understand why people can't be more patient with young players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Exactly. Last year the 2015 draft looked bad but now it's pretty damn clear that Funch, Williams and Mayo were all definite great picks. Shaq is still up in the air. He's solid, not looking like worthy of a 1st rounder, but there's still time if he can have a more clearly defined role in the D. And CAP ain't no slouch either, for where he was picked. I don't understand why people can't be more patient with young players.

Don’t forget Mayo and CAP were comp picks, the fruits of which came from letting guys go after 2013 for the betterment of our long term health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...