Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers may not play after all


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

If I am a Packers fan I would pray they just sit him the rest of the year. Let Hundley get reps and try and make him look good while still losing. Get a high draft pick and try and trade Hundley in the off-season. I mean poo, the browns were about to trade a second rounder for fuging AJ McCarron.

Maybe if the Packers were healthier it would be worth it but the Packers offensive line is terrible and I don't see how it is worth risking re-injuring your 34 year old QB for a wildcard spot. Just ask the Cowboys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the bone is only 80% healed it would be stupid to.play him. It doesn't take that much force to break a healthy one let alone one not totally healed. This isn't like a sprain or something you can tape up and play on.   Plus to stand a chance they need to beat the Panthers, Vikings and Lions in subsequent weeks. That isn't going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, beastson said:

Dumb ass heath evans said yesterday if he got re-injured it's just 4-6 weeks and another surgery

Who the fug wants to keep getting surgery especially on their throwing arm. Aaron Rodgers 34 years old, he's not young

Exactly!  Rodgers is one of the greatest QB's to ever play, and you want to shorten his career for AT BEST a 10-6 season and most likely losing in the playoffs in the best case scenario?  Jesus, That really is some browns level idiocy right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, beastson said:

Dumb ass heath evans said yesterday if he got re-injured it's just 4-6 weeks and another surgery

Who the fug wants to keep getting surgery especially on their throwing arm. Aaron Rodgers 34 years old, he's not young

Heath Evans is a neanderthal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Sounds like something a 13 year old would. Aaron Rodgers is actually a really good dude and I certainly wouldn't wish injury or re-injury on him

Dude is a great QB, no doubt. Really good dude? His own FAMILY might disagree on that point. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/aaron-rodgers-still-isnt-talking-to-his-family-after-splitting-from-olivia-munn-w486120/amp/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a weird situation.  We should prepare for Hundley and be ready for that.

But damn if Rodgers ain’t sitting over there waiting to go.  What do you do?

“Hey Luke, study up on this Hundley kid but also, if you could just keep in mind you might possibly be facing Aaron Rodgers.” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...