Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Props to Bersin


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

You people that like Bersin are delusional.  He sucks now, sucked yesterday and will suck tomorrow.  He made a nice catch today.  Whooptie flippin doo.

 

Jerome Simpson had a better career and he is known for one play.

 

It is more than sad that any of our hopes are pinned on Bersin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SIGCHI222 said:

You people that like Bersin are delusional.  He sucks now, sucked yesterday and will suck tomorrow.  He made a nice catch today.  Whooptie flippin doo.

 

Jerome Simpson had a better career and he is known for one play.

 

It is more than sad that any of our hopes are pinned on Bersin.

You are overreacting so hard. Putting our hopes in Bersin? Who said that? Dude made a nice catch, give him props. Nobody is saying they want him to be our #2 WR. Frankly, I wish he wasn't on the roster and we had better depth. But I don't mind tipping my cap to a highlight play if he makes one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Still Brooklyn said:

Ok. I'll make a thread for every special teams player that made a tackle out there today!

The dude caught a ball in which he was literally flipped in the air and landed on his shoulders. But sure, a special teams tackle is the same thing. You're totally right dude. What a garbage play. Not even worth mentioning. And as you say, he's no superstar so why should we even acknowledge him at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

The dude caught a ball in which he was literally flipped in the air and landed on his shoulders. But sure, a special teams tackle is the same thing. You're totally right dude. What a garbage play. Not even worth mentioning. And as you say, he's no superstar so why should we even acknowledge him at all?

Are you new here? People have wanted him to be a huge part of the team for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Still Brooklyn said:

Are you new here? People have wanted him to be a huge part of the team for years.

I've been on these boards since the day we signed Keyshawn Johnson (this was the first place that popped up when I searched it)

I can say confidently that NOBODY has ever wanted him to be a vital key to our offense as you claim. Thus the "get Cam weapons. Our WRs suck" threads that have existed on this site his entire career. Let it go dude 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...