Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Waldman - Devin Funchess, A Future 'Middle Class' Julio Jones?


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Over the course of the past four weeks, Funchess has more than confirmed to be a competent replacement for Kelvin Benjamin. His production the past few games has been unreal, despite the few drops he's had over the last two weeks.

DQa3QcjUEAAMjE3.jpg

That's solid production. Really solid. 

It's even enough to make one particular analyst turn his head towards Funchess.

If you haven't heard of Matt Waldman, he's been one particular draft analyst I really enjoyed over the off-season. He's known to do incredible work and give very good, insightful analysis. Many people respect him and his ideas on certain players, teams, and future draft classes. 

Recently, Matt Waldman even began drawing comparisons of Funchess to Julio Jones. Seriously. While Funchess is certainly not close to Julio Jones total skillset, he's shown plenty of flashes of being what Matt Waldman calls a future "middle class" version of Julio. 

Take a look at one of his mini-breakdown videos.

For those wondering what Matt Waldman means by his comparison, he answers that question here:

A very nice analogy and explanation on his opinion on Funchess. While Funchess isn't close to Julio's level of skill, he's getting very close to Julio's style of play. 

Just something to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he has a lot of potential. I also think he’s built well to play WR. Not overly fast but has a great stride and nice hands. 

In comparison to KB he’s not as massive but you can tell he’s more stout and more well rounded muscle wise. He also seems to have pretty great control of his body where as KB has a sort of awkwardness about his game. Which I think makes him less injury prone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Vagrant said:

He needs to figure out how to run routes to the first down marker. I have been really encouraged about everything about his game except field awareness. 

interesting. aside one play from the saints, he's been amazing at ensuring he does get to the first down marker and getting the right depth in my opinion.

wrote about it a bit here.

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/2017/11/23/carolina-panthers-devin-funchess-2/

When Devin Funchess entered the NFL in 2015, he was one of the youngest at the age of 20. During his rookie season, he showed plenty of flashes, but never found much consistency. However, for a young receiver his age, it’s not surprising that it’d take a little time for him to grow.

Entering year three, it appears Devin Funchess finally found his groove. At his current age of 23, he’s still younger than current rookies Cooper Kupp, Kenny Golladay, and Dede Westbrook. It’s still pretty mind-blowing that a year three veteran is younger than plenty of rookies.

On the field, he shows plenty of improvement with route-running and situational awareness. While in his rookie year, he was comparable to a deer in headlights on the field; unsure what to do. Nowadays, he understands the NFL better, and it shows.

Against the Dolphins, he showcases his improved route running and awareness on one particular play.

giphy.gif

On this play, the Panthers face a 3rd down. The Miami defense is in zone with Devin Funchess lining up to the left of Cam. On the snap, he runs a hitch route and does enough for the first down.

What’s incredible is how Funchess completes this. He begins by running and selling the outside route to the corner ahead of him. Since the corner thinks the Panther receiver is going outside, he sits back, consequently allowing Funchess to gain leverage inside.

Once he gains enough depth, Funchess quickly turns around on his hitch route. The timing of this was impeccable; causing Miami defenders to be 2+ yards ahead of the first down marker. Afterwards, he runs back to the first down marker, allowing Cam Newton to throw a beauty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hyperbole in today's world is just ridiculous. Funchess looked like a bust now he's emerging into being a solid starter and now we're trying to compare him to Julio. My god. Now people will be bitching next year because he's not Julio. Can't we just appreciate that he's a solid starter and calm the fug down and not heap expectations on him that are almost certainly out of reach? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The hyperbole in today's world is just ridiculous. Funchess looked like a bust now he's emerging into being a solid starter and now we're trying to compare him to Julio. My god. Now people will be bitching next year because he's not Julio. Can't we just appreciate that he's a solid starter and calm the fug down and not heap expectations on him that are almost certainly out of reach? 

No, no, no.  Just this guy and some random twitter guy is doing that.  He’s solid and that’s it to most of us.  Saca can’t get past the fact Worley is hot garbage.  So, he’ll just hype up Funchess instead.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The hyperbole in today's world is just ridiculous. Funchess looked like a bust now he's emerging into being a solid starter and now we're trying to compare him to Julio. My god. Now people will be bitching next year because he's not Julio. Can't we just appreciate that he's a solid starter and calm the fug down and not heap expectations on him that are almost certainly out of reach? 

i mean if you actually read maybe you'd clearly see the part where funchess isn't close to julio's level, but comparable in certain traits that give him potential.

he's comparable in certain traits you see from julio. but he'll never touch julio's skillset or overall level. that doesn't mean a receiver will not show some similarities in certain areas to better receivers, or said receiver is just as good.

plus this isn't my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

i mean if you actually read maybe you'd clearly see the part where funchess isn't close to julio's level, but comparable in certain traits that give him potential.

he's comparable in certain traits you see from julio. but he'll never touch julio's skillset or overall level. that doesn't mean a receiver will not show some similarities in certain areas to better receivers, or said receiver is just as good.

plus this isn't my opinion.

Sorry man, it's just an awful comparison. 

Ironically, I think it's another Falcons WR Funchess compares pretty favorably to and that's Mohamed Sanu. He's basically a bigger version of Sanu. Both are good route runners who are pretty good at finding holes in zones with hot/cold hands who don't have big time deep speed and despite being big WRs aren't particularly great in traffic. I think Funchess has a bit more potential than Sanu, but overall I think they're relatively comparable. Julio though... man, it's just laughable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sorry man, it's just an awful comparison. 

Ironically, I think it's another Falcons WR Funchess compares pretty favorably to and that's Mohamed Sanu. He's basically a bigger version of Sanu. Both are good route runners who are pretty good at finding holes in zones with hot/cold hands who don't have big time deep speed and despite being big WRs aren't particularly great in traffic. I think Funchess has a bit more potential than Sanu, but overall I think they're relatively comparable. Julio though... man, it's just laughable. 

i can see waldman's point when talking about stylistically they're similar. both are flexible athletic receivers with great ball tracking skills on out routes and such. but definitely agree he's not even half of who julio is yet, and i doubt he'll ever reach julio's level over the course of his entire career.

but in my opinion, if i were to compare funchess to a past panther receiver, he's most comparable to moose. funchess has potential, but don't worry im not insinuating he's julio by any means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see Funchess as anywhere near as physical as Moose. Moose's physicality was his best asset. I don't feel that Funchess plays up to his size most of the time and isn't the great competing for the ball in traffic. If you could give Funchess KB's ability to get jump balls and compete in traffic you'd really have something. Maybe he can develop that as he has the size, but it's usually one of those things that you either have it or you don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...