Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why was that not deemed a successful onside recovery by Funchess?


CatTower

Recommended Posts

Just now, Popsickle said:

You're an idiot, learn the rules. He never establishes possession in bonds, furthermore, the toss to Jacobs was after he landed out of bounds. 

fug you're a retarded fug. 

THE TOSS TO JACOBS DOESN"T MATTER.  HE"S OUT OF BOUNDS AT THAT POINTS>

 

What I'm saying is he had possession before he went out of bounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CatTower said:

No, he didn't.  He had both his hands on the ball securely and then flipped it up to Jacobs.  He clearly had possession before hitting the out of bounds line.  

he fell out of bounds before he flipped the ball...to recover he would have had to fall in bounds or flipped it before he went out of bounds...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CatTower said:

THE TOSS TO JACOBS DOESN"T MATTER.  HE"S OUT OF BOUNDS AT THAT POINTS>

 

What I'm saying is he had possession before he went out of bounds.

Like I said before, you're a fuging retarded fug. Fun fun did not possess the ball in bounds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...