Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: Carolina's Run Game Struggled For Most Of The Season Because Shula Literally Crapped The Bed On How To Use CMC & Stewart


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Like someone mentioned, in the postgame interview on ESPN Steve Young said to McCaffrey something along the lines of “Why don’t they run you out of the I?!”and McCaffrey responded “That’s a great question. Why don’t you tell coach that! We’ll both tell coach that!” and they had a good chuckle.

I’m sure Shula and Rivera will get around to addressing this in July.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McCaffrey's actually made it clear in a few different instances that he wants more playing time at running back and more carries (two recent examples being his interview with Deon Sanders after the Falcons game and then that instance with Steve Young on Monday Night). 

Its unfortunate but he's in a quagmire for a rookie running back. All of our backs have been healthy this year and I think the coaches love Jonathan Stewart to absolute death. He became the franchises leading rusher this season, he's only 30 , and he just cashed in a nice performance against the Dolphins. He's just not going to get enough carries to get in a rythm like he could at Stanford . I'm pretty sure Stewart's only totally healthy season as far as the Rivera era was the 1st year in 2011 .  I'm not really sure that McCaffrey will really have the opportunity to dominate like he did in college as long as he's here honestly, the coaches don't want to use him that way and prefer Stewart to take the vast majority of carries . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is such a useless article. So where are the stats showing he is much better when we do run those plays this year? Also comparing college where he has a dominant OL to the NFL is retarded.

Shula may be the worst but this article proves literally nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight...PFF decides to tally up the percentages of how often we run out of certain concepts and instead of then proceeding to provide useful data in breaking down his YPC out of each concept, they decide to just stop there? And....y’all are really actually eating this sh&$ up? For anyone who pied the OP and/or posted something to support the validity of this article...y’all are either so blind with hatred for Shula that you’ll believe anything negative about him, or...I’ll just stop there.

 

Come on people...don’t be sheep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Saca312 said:

An interesting take from PFF. Apparently, it seems his lack of production could in fact be traced to scheme.

They say if this were the 2016 running scheme, CMC would have far better production than he is now. 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-is-a-shift-in-scheme-keeping-mccaffrey-grounded

Something to think about. 

 

I find it kind of funny that you rip PFF to shreds at times and then go base a thread off of what they say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

It funny how you use PFF when it suits your narrative, but when it doesn’t you shrug them off as a joke.

 

All I know is CAP is averaging 6.6 ypc with that same line Mccaffrey and Stewart are using. 

Mostly in mop up duty against the Dolphins. I like CAP and think he deserves a bit bigger role, maybe even over Stew at some point but trying to compare their YPC is silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thomas96 said:

Mostly in mop up duty against the Dolphins. I like CAP and think he deserves a bit bigger role, maybe even over Stew at some point but trying to compare their YPC is silly.

When CAP gets carries in meaningful time he still has put produced Mccaffrey 

 

Show me a run Stewart or Mccaffrey have had this season better than this one 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Football isn't so simple where the right scheme will fix all. We didn't do much different last week than we have all season. Same plays, just not as much in A gap as we have tried the first half of the season. I formation, shotgun, singleback. Doesn't matter if the blocking isn't there. The OL plays well, RBs look good. It's that simple. No 1,000 yard back got that yardage with a bad OL.

 

We didn't run more powers or counters. We executed them and ran a few less inside zone or iso plays. Literally all the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a PFF fan, but this does bring up a point. 

Back when we were looking for an offensive coordinator, we interviewed guys who ran systems that didn't fit our personnel at all. Why would you do something like that? I believe it's because Rivera didn't even know, or care. He probably figures offense is just offense.

In the same vein, I wonder: Does Shula know the difference between these things, or is it something he doesn't bother with?

Some coaches know and understand the deep details of the game. Others do not.

From what I've seen of our coaches, I'm pretty sure they fall into category number two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

When CAP gets carries in meaningful time he still has put produced Mccaffrey 

 

Show me a run Stewart or Mccaffrey have had this season better than this one 

 

 

    For someone who always harps on garbage time stats. That run is the epitome of garbage time. The Phins had given up long before that run. 

 

    I like Cap as well as anyone. And am rooting for him to be more involved as the season goes. Especially, because with our WR corp. is in a bit of a mess. We should be running the ball a bit more. 

 

    IMO, if we can continue to run the ball well. Cap will be getting a larger share of the carries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Harmony Flow CBD Gummies || https://supplementcarts.com/harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-official/ Harmony Flow CBD Gummies stand separated as a normal #1 for anyone hoping to work on their success through typical fixes. These gummies are not just typical sweets; they are framed with an exceptional blend of trimmings planned to help an extent of clinical benefits, including additionally created beat rule, better cholesterol levels, and weight the board. For by far most, incorporating such upgrades into their everyday timetable is a drawing in framework to deal with lifestyle related clinical issues. With the climb of CBD things in the standard market, it becomes crucial to look at what compels Harmony Flow CBD Gummies a basic contender. This review will hop significant into their definition, practicality, benefits, assessing plan, and buyer analysis to help anticipated buyers with chasing after an informed decision. Whether you're expecting to work on your overall prosperity or direct express conditions, Harmony Flow CBD Gummies could justify considering as a part of a comprehensive method for managing flourishing.   Facebook Page:- https://www.facebook.com/Harmony.Flow.CBD.Gummies/ https://www.facebook.com/events/1944377819402039/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/1953646655111216 https://www.facebook.com/Online.Supra.Keto.BHB.ACV.Gummies.UK/   More Related Blogs https://zenodo.org/records/14012614 https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.webflow.io/ https://in.pinterest.com/HarmonyFlowCBDGummies/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummiesofficial.quora.com/ https://in.pinterest.com/pin/1132444268799258229 https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-1.jimdosite.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.mystrikingly.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.godaddysites.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies95.mywebselfsite.net/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.unicornplatform.page/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-official.mystrikingly.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-reviews.mywebselfsite.net https://harmonyflowcbdgummiesofficial.godaddysites.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-official.uncrn.co/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummies.quora.com/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummies.godaddysites.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-3.jimdosite.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbdgummies.mystrikingly.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-ccda58.webflow.io/ https://news.bangboxonline.com/Harmony-Flow-CBD-Gummies https://dedicated-ferret-mgq9gt.mystrikingly.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.mywebselfsite.net/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummies5.godaddysites.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.jimdosite.com https://harmonyflowcbdgummies4.godaddysites.com/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummiesreview.quora.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-reviews.uncrn.co/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies77.mywebselfsite.net/
    • I didn't say much bigger. Watch the highlights I linked. Bryce doesn't have the arm strength and/or talent to make the vast majority of the throws Mac made in that video. 
    • Tetairoa McMillan.   The last 28 1st overall picks were either a QB, DE, or OT. Seeing as I don't think we'd take an OT in the 1st and give up on Ickey as an LT yet and there doesn't seem to be a clear overall #1 type of QB or DE pick this year, it very well could be a non conventional #1 overall this year, at least in regards from the last almost 3 decades of drafts. If we didn't have Horn, I'd be more open to Hunter as a CB at #1, but we have him so another CB wouldn't be how I'd use a #1 pick.  And as much as I love Legette, if we have SB contending aspirations, I don't think Legette is a #1 on a team like that, but he damn sure is an elite #2 on a team like that.  He's more of the Smith/Higgins/Waddle to Brown/Chase/Hill (in terms of role/impact, not style of play of course). T-Mac is going to be the top ranked WR on every team's board in the end.  He is going to be a true outside #1 WR who is viewed as a consensus Top 5 WR in the game by his second contract in the same way guys like Jefferson and Chase have done.  His height combined with his speed, athleticism, and hands are near impossible to find all in one player, there is a reason his generally used comp is Mike Evans (although as he's not as thick, I personally see him more as an AJ Green). Yes, as an Arizona alum I've admitted to having bias towards the player to begin with.  But he's also someone very widely being put into the Top 5 in mock drafts lately and most of them have him as the first non QB offensive player being taken, so it's not really THAT much of a homer pick on my part anyways. If a QB or DE truly separate themselves as being a can't miss prospect come draft day, I'm open to that discussion, but until then, or if it doesn't happen, T-Mac is my pick 100 times out of 100.
×
×
  • Create New...