Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vague Worley tweet


TN05

Recommended Posts

If he hadn't whined about his role before, including this week...this probably wouldn't have been that big of a deal.

it's starting to become  habit for him. when things aren't going his way on the team this year regarding his role, he takes to twitter or to the press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to to take the "wait and see" approach when it comes to something as ambiguous as this tweet is. It may be exactly what folks are jumping all over him for, but it also might just be innocuous and he's excited to finally get back to playing football, since we have the Monday Night game.

 

I'm really hoping it's the latter, but won't cry if it's the former and he gets shown the door. No place on this team for media players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So looking for a honest and rational understanding of whether or not he actually sucks. 

I know he gets picked on, and maybe he is the weakest link- but doesn't every team have a "weakest link?" Not everyone can be the Luuuke of their positions, and no matter if you were to bench him, someone else becomes the weakest link. Seymour provides a honest competition at his spot and maybe he handles his specific duties better (man coverage vs coverage) but even still the weakest link shifts somewhere else. 

To my own eyes he is servicable and a mostly reliable cornerback. I've seen Bradberry get burned and the safeties get embarrassed too so it's not like we have a super spectacular crew back there wrecking games... they do well mostly because of the strength of the line and linebackers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Asurfaholic said:

So looking for a honest and rational understanding of whether or not he actually sucks. 

I know he gets picked on, and maybe he is the weakest link- but doesn't every team have a "weakest link?" Not everyone can be the Luuuke of their positions, and no matter if you were to bench him, someone else becomes the weakest link. Seymour provides a honest competition at his spot and maybe he handles his specific duties better (man coverage vs coverage) but even still the weakest link shifts somewhere else. 

To my own eyes he is servicable and a mostly reliable cornerback. I've seen Bradberry get burned and the safeties get embarrassed too so it's not like we have a super spectacular crew back there wrecking games... they do well mostly because of the strength of the line and linebackers.

Getting picked on every snap you're on the field usually means you suck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...