Aaron Hernandez's Brain

[Floppin]

28 minutes ago, RealisticPanther said:

yea bro, i read that study, its complete garbage, all the studies they cite are poorly done, inconclusive, or simply conjecture. They give a bunch of science of how things work which sounds good to people who don't know how to interpret studies and go "hmmm, axonal damage and transduction pathway names and big words, sounds legit"...but its all a bunch of filler. Yes, that's how any damage, long term, short term, from brief inflammation, whatever works...and? The studies they cite as "proof" are as I said simply conjecture...or purposely misinterpreted. The studies they cite showing that football players have "3x the instance of mortality from neurological pathology" ...well football players have half of the overall mortality of the general population...they live a lot longer than the normal population so no shyt the risk of dying from neurological diseases is gonna increase when you live longer.

I hope that if you feel the need to have an opinion about this you reconsider your position or how strongly you're convinced of your position, because, to put it bluntly, you're wrong and obviously don't have the deductive reasoning skills or know how to interpret the studies you get your information from to distinguish good information and conclusions from bad. 

Its fun you take a slight at my deductive reasoning while applying your own bullshit conjecture and self applied confirmation bias. Be intellectually honest or gtfo of intellectual conversation.

[Fox007]

We know that psychopaths have different brain chemistry than the rest of us.....we don't excuse them if they kill and actually think worse of them from how you see people respond to confirmed psychotics. I always found that interesting.

 

[Mvp2014]

I think he was a psychopath from tge get go and maybe CTE exacerbated it.  Having several friends and even an uncle with serious mental illness I still feel bad for the guy.  Everyone has different genetic snd environmental factors and i cant judge them.  Still think ALL murderers should get death penalty but i feel pitt for them if they are sick and not in a normal state of mind.  

[CPcavedweller]

4 hours ago, Floppin said:

Only due to a technicality by way of state precedent that if a defendant dies while a case is in direct appeal then the case is removed as if it never happened. Its a stupid and old rule for that state and doesn't exonerate him. So saying he was found not guilty is being disingenuous.

He was found not guilty of the double homicide in Boston which was a separate case from Attleboro by a jury of his peers. What do you not understand about That? 

His Attleboro case was dismissed because the law is the law. If a person cannot defend themselves during aopeal, is there not a reason to throw it out?

[CPcavedweller]

4 hours ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

agree with all your points except the bolded. when you have people who survived the attack only to magically end up dead a few weeks later definitely raises some suspicion. google Dennis and Lorraine Carver and Kymberley Suchomel

so far that's 3, one of whom went on record to say she saw multiple shooters including a shooter on ground level. This is not un common at all. There were many survivors of 9/11 who mysteriously ended up dead, there's been doctors who've introduced potential cures for cancer who were killed. Of course, can't leave out David Crawly, the creator of Gray State which exposed the inevitable martial law and FEMA camps in the US, who was found dead along with his wife, and kid in an apparent murder suicide. And like you pointed out, the death of Seth Rich who exposed Hilary's emails to Assange and wikileaks. 

look, i try not to be a conspiracy nut, but when facts and common sense tell you otherwise, it's hard to believe the official narratives and anything the mainstream media puts out there. 

 

 

You never watched final destination I'm guessing?

[CPcavedweller]

4 hours ago, Floppin said:

Only due to a technicality by way of state precedent that if a defendant dies while a case is in direct appeal then the case is removed as if it never happened. Its a stupid and old rule for that state and doesn't exonerate him. So saying he was found not guilty is being disingenuous.

Calling me disingenuous when you are provably incorrect is hilarious. I'm not sticking up for the guy, I'm just telling you the truth. Denying what I'm saying isn't only disingenuous,  it shows your serious lack of Google skills.

[CPcavedweller]

4 hours ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

agree with all your points except the bolded. when you have people who survived the attack only to magically end up dead a few weeks later definitely raises some suspicion. google Dennis and Lorraine Carver and Kymberley Suchomel

so far that's 3, one of whom went on record to say she saw multiple shooters including a shooter on ground level. This is not un common at all. There were many survivors of 9/11 who mysteriously ended up dead, there's been doctors who've introduced potential cures for cancer who were killed. Of course, can't leave out David Crawly, the creator of Gray State which exposed the inevitable martial law and FEMA camps in the US, who was found dead along with his wife, and kid in an apparent murder suicide. And like you pointed out, the death of Seth Rich who exposed Hilary's emails to Assange and wikileaks. 

look, i try not to be a conspiracy nut, but when facts and common sense tell you otherwise, it's hard to believe the official narratives and anything the mainstream media puts out there. 

 

 

The Seth Rich thing stinks. To me, the outrage by the core democrats over Russia is manufactured purely to rile their base up, but few know the truth.

Drunk staffer is murdered, nothing stolen, was disenfranchised by the preferential treatment Hillary received, had access, means, and motive. Has been confirmed by Assange to have had a hand in the release of the emails.

[darrybear]

5 hours ago, sharkkiller said:

There are millions of people who have lost parents at young ages and were raised in bad situations. But they didn't turn into homicidal maniacs. There are also thousands of people who have CTE and never killed anyone. Why do people insist on finding excuses for people doing bad things? He was simply an evil person, and deserves no one's pity. His child does, but not him. 

And those people are exceptions to the rules look up the statistics  for orphans  and how well they fare. There is a reason why they ask if  you're an orphan   AND they try to give you fUNDING. because it is very likely for them to drop out and become criminals.  Especially when it is dealing with emotional issues is hard to say what will happen the mind is a very complex thing. If it were that easy it wouldn't be this common,  is easier said than done.  And losing a parent isnt easy especially at a young age when you need guidance the most. It doesn't go away the pain never goes away you just learn to live with it and cope sometimes it drives you nuts and you are never the same it's so easy to talk but is way different situation when you  have to deal with it forever.  I'll be honest I have never mentally recovered since my mom died never. I live with my dad I've known my dad my whole life, I have a whole stepmom a whole bunch of siblings so much support    We've lived a comfortable middle class Life but mentally I have not recovered. There are days that I think I'm fine and I'm on the straight path and then there's other days where I feel miserable and completely empty and I don't see the point of even fuging living. I keep pushing because I find reasons to push but I know not everybody is like that not everybody takes tragedy the same some people are changed forever and you need to understand that.  You would like to think that people just do stuff to do stuff because it would make it simple that theyre this bad person. However things are not black-and-white any emotional hangups and scars can fug you up permanently and in heavy unfortunate ways.  I really really want to believe people are just evil because then I can get angry at them because then I can get even with them, but the truth of the matter is most of the people out here killing and hurting people are not just doing it because they're just evil.  that's just too easy there's more to it and that doesn't change  what he has done. What he did was wrong no one is ever going to say it wasn't but given the circumstances I'm not really shocked most people don't recover we just cope. 

[Mojoman]

5 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Humans contribute less than 3% of total carbon output on Earth. Do humans contribute to the warming? It's possible but it's not exactly measurable. One can assume but assumptions that haven't been or can't be proven aren't science. Not only that, but as carbon causes a warming effect, ice melts, effectively speeding up the warming process because insulators are being removed while carbon is still increasing. Eventually, this will disrupt the ocean currents due to water temperature and density differences, leading to a lack of re-distribution of wealth warmth, causing the Poles to freeze again and effectively causing the next ice age.

This isn't from a movie. It's real life and it has happened previously. We are in the middle of an interglacial period, an interglacial period that scientists say is warmer than it should be at this point. But meteorologists can't predict weather correctly 5 days out, so why would a climatologist be able to predict the climate 10,000 years out.

Last point, scientists argue that it is the warmest it's been in the 10's of thousands of years. Earth is 4,600,000,000 years old. So you have a comparison of 10,000 to 4,600,000,000. Its statistically insignificant and irrelevant to assume that science is infallible. 

And no, the Earth isn't flat and there is no conspiracy with Vegas. Though I do think the death of a DNC Staffer in Washington D.C. in a supposed robbery gone wrong is suspicious. B613. 

Trump Retard

 

[Floppin]

44 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Calling me disingenuous when you are provably incorrect is hilarious. I'm not sticking up for the guy, I'm just telling you the truth. Denying what I'm saying isn't only disingenuous,  it shows your serious lack of Google skills.

I confirmed all this doofus. By proclaiming that he was found not guilty as some gotcha moment you're being disingenuous. You know which case he was found not guilty (the double murder as I pointed out before) and which case was defacto thrown out on technicality (which we both agree on and despite the fact that he was in fact found guilty). But without proper context you come off as defending him and you know that. That's all I was pointing out.

[Popsickle]

Can we get this moved to the Tinderbox now?  Should have been moved hours ago. 

[CPcavedweller]

40 minutes ago, HornetsSting said:

Russia or no Russia, Trump is still a con man that has accomplished absolutely nothing during his presidency. Don't even say "but the economy!" Wait, you mean the same economy you discredited and called fake under Obama?! Get the fug outta here

I didn't call any economy fake. We never reached 3% GDP growth under Obama and all the economists I hears said it could never happen under Trump...and it has happened.

Second, I'm not worried about accomplishments. When it comes to government, sometimes less is more. Other than healthcare and lowering the corporate and small business tax rate, I don't care to see much else.

[CPcavedweller]

47 minutes ago, Mojoman said:

Trump Retard

 

Didn't vote for Trump. Nice try though.

 

Fun fact: the last two presidential candidates that called half the country a foul name has lost the election. You could learn from their mistake.

[CPcavedweller]

47 minutes ago, Floppin said:

I confirmed all this doofus. By proclaiming that he was found not guilty as some gotcha moment you're being disingenuous. You know which case he was found not guilty (the double murder as I pointed out before) and which case was defacto thrown out on technicality (which we both agree on and despite the fact that he was in fact found guilty). But without proper context you come off as defending him and you know that. That's all I was pointing out.

I'm a defender of what is just.