Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

X-Men / Avengers Crossovers Now Possible?

twylyght

By twylyght,
in Nerdvana

Recommended Posts

Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

I actually like X-Men being it's own universe.    There would be too much going on.    X-Men has a different feel to me, it's darker, etc, so I hope they keep it there.  

Now if we could get a good Doctor Doom, Galactus, Silver Silver out of it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted

The Inhumans, Spiderman, and, Deadpool are trying to bridge the gap...all we need is agent Colston and BOOM! something else for the movies.

btw The Inhumans sucks and might as well not count on that.., The Gifted is based out of the Xmen Universe and works much better.

also....

640full-natalie-alyn-lind.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
arbnranger Explorer

arbnranger

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, electro's horse said:

like the most pointless third fourth rate xman character completely wipes out the avengers without breaking a sweat

rogue was invented just to take them out

you can't have these two together

you could have the entirety of the avengers and like jubilee and gambit would kill them all

I don’t nerd out on these characters but I was thinking the same thing. 

Would like to hear what others think about that as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, arbnranger said:

I don’t nerd out on these characters but I was thinking the same thing. 

Would like to hear what others think about that as well. 

Right which is why I like them separate, honestly.   X-Men universe is fine on its own.     Or you could keep them in different multiverse and whatnot and only have small crossovers but living in the same world is too much.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, PandaPancake said:

Would it be an X-Men movie that doesn't touch on oppression? This theme is old and tired

Yeah it kind of is.    Hopefully Dark Phoenix maybe.     I'd be OK with crossover if they are on different "worlds" because I just can't picture X-Men and Avengers on the same planet in the movie universe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Yeah it kind of is.    Hopefully Dark Phoenix maybe.     I'd be OK with crossover if they are on different "worlds" because I just can't picture X-Men and Avengers on the same planet in the movie universe.

I can because the X-Men have always kept to themselves. Move to Genosha or that asteroid in orbit. They do live in secret

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moorgan Enthusiast

Moorgan

Posted
Posted
On ‎12‎/‎1‎/‎2017 at 5:25 PM, Still Brooklyn said:

Two words: Secret Wars

Isn't that the story with the Beyonder, Molecule Man and when Spidey gets the black suit? That was extraordinarily dumb. It was just an excuse to have everyone in one comic. Didn't matter that the Beyonder was just the ex Machina for the writers to make it go however they wanted without needing to make sense. I hope they do not do this.

As for the crossover idea and the Xmen story not being about opression...the entire premise of the Xmen story is opression and mutant rights etc. It's the foundation of what they're about. Arguably it's what made them more interesting than the Avengers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...