Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC haters...get in here and bring your fork


Shocker

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, saints4lifeagain said:

I can see it's easy to get excited.

...about a rookie who runs better routes, has better hands, and is open more often, than nine out of ten veteran receivers in the entire league, leads in receptions for a back, YAC, draws defenders like almost no one else, and when/if our underperforming line actually makes their blocks, runs a good ball. Speaking of blocking, he's damn good at that already as well, and with a year of NFL strength and conditioning coaching, will only get better. And speaking of coaching, if you guys had him, his numbers would be twice as much, but with Rivera and Shula calling the shots, it gets tamped down quite a bit. So, when we see him get blocks or targets, or a play gets called that specifically takes advantage of his abilities, sure, we get excited, and so would you if he had one of those lance flowers on his helmet instead of a badass panther head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm right here and the guy would actually have had a respectable statline if he stopped trying to break things to the inside.

I was at the game and haven't had a chance to rewatch but this dumb motherfuger keeps giving up chunk yards cutting back to the inside. 

on the final drive he could have scored a TD and salted the game away if he had just run to the corner. 

He did it once earlier in the game as well. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Where are all u CMC haters?  I hear crickets.

There was literally only like 2 people saying stupid poo about CMC so.....

And Fiz is actually right about his cuts to the inside above....he has done that 3 times and cost himself at least 10 yards each time...but Fiz and like that one other guy are the only people who say poo about CMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...