Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So only 4 WRs on the roster..


ItsPantone278

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, top dawg said:

It's just weird. They have to know something that we don't. 

I wouldn't bet any money on that.

And yes, all trades involve a physical. If Benjamin were to fail it, he'd revert back to us, in which case there's the possibility that he's cut and we get nothing.

It would be pretty awkward either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Positivepantherfan said:

What if we get Calvin johnson

I liked Kelvin, wanted him,... but for Megatron? Hurney be da man,...

but we won't so Hurney is a mole,.. gif of mole from Austin Powers anyone?

hurney is probably going to buffalo after this season, probably take Brandon beenes side or something,... only reason besides total stupidity he made that trade,..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KendrickPanther said:

This logic that they needed to open up a spot on the field... we can sub KB out if we want to... play him less snaps. Now he's gone and this 5-3 team has no added talent to fight for the playoffs. God help us if Funchess or Samuel get hurt... depth isn't a bad thing.

Funchess,... man we are not going to win another game,.... maybe the Dolphins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Funchess,... man we are not going to win another game,.... maybe the Dolphins.

I'm not of the mindset that less talent=good thing, nor am I believer of the addition by subtraction theory in this case.  One thing I will say though is this team personnel wise is horridly flawed offensively.  It has as much to do with it's design as anything.  I could go on about Shula, health issues, Cams inconsistencies, or the below average ability at tackle, but none of those issues out weigh the fact that the offensive personnel is poorly constructed for the "evolved" offense.  And we weren't going to see it this year with or without KB.  When we lost to Chicago most of us knew this wasn't the year.  Now we are forced to see what we truly have in McCaffery Funchess and Samuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ItsPantone278 said:

I'm not of the mindset that less talent=good thing, nor am I believer of the addition by subtraction theory in this case.  One thing I will say though is this team personnel wise is horridly flawed offensively.  It has as much to do with it's design as anything.  I could go on about Shula, health issues, Cams inconsistencies, or the below average ability at tackle, but none of those issues out weigh the fact that the offensive personnel is poorly constructed for the "evolved" offense.  And we weren't going to see it this year with or without KB.  When we lost to Chicago most of us knew this wasn't the year.  Now we are forced to see what we truly have in McCaffery Funchess and Samuel.

I feel so much better,... now I'll go drink a gallon of bleach,...

is this how Browns fans feel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...