Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let’s hope Samuel can at least be the next Ginn


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

Because if not this offense is going to be a bigger poo fest than it already is.

2015 only worked without KB because Tedd Ginn stepped up and had the season of his life. If he didn’t have bricks for hands Ginn may have went for over 1000 yards and 15 tds. The guy dropped at least 5 gimmie TD bombs and still had 10 scores that year.

Everyone needs to be on the Curtis Samuel hype train or this team is royally fuged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRed said:

The biggest issue is depth.

We've got Funchess, Samuel, and some dude from the bottom of the Bucs roster.

We've already passed the trade deadline. We're locked in with this group. Better hope they can stay healthy.

Two weeks ago if you told me KB wouldn't be on the roster for the Atlanta game and Kaelin Clay would be, I would have laughed in your face 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Eazy-E said:

Because if not this offense is going to be a bigger poo fest than it already is.

2015 only worked without KB because Tedd Ginn stepped up and had the season of his life. If he didn’t have bricks for hands Ginn may have went for over 1000 yards and 15 tds. The guy dropped at least 5 gimmie TD bombs and still had 10 scores that year.

Everyone needs to be on the Curtis Samuel hype train or this team is royally fuged.

What is it that KB brings that is not replaceable or easily replaced? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TheRed said:

The biggest issue is depth.

We've got Funchess, Samuel, CMC, and some dude from the bottom of the Bucs roster.

We've already passed the trade deadline. We're locked in with this group. Better hope they can stay healthy.

This is what I'm questioning. What happens if Funchess gets hurt? The best receiver on the roster is then Sheppard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, g_d0t said:

500 yards and 2 tds on less targets than funchess and mcaffrey

Exactly.

No one is talking about how efficient Kelvin was compared to our new number one. Funchess right now has around the same production he had the entirety of last season. At first it looks like he's improved quite a bit, but in reality he's just had double the targets this season. His production hasn't actually changed much from last season, he's just being fed much more. He's on pace for only around 700 yards total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...